Cricket - Sky Sports Expert

Nostradamus Fulton

Sky Sports cricket pundit Dave Fulton unveils the perfect future for the county game

Posted: 12th September 2008 14:10

Subscribe to RSS FeedSubscribe to RSS Feed Send an email to CricketEmail Cricket

Edgbaston rain and umbrella

Rain: Kills the ambition of some teams

I'll be honest modesty has never been my strongest suit. So imagine my delight when my talents as a visionary of cricket - a prophet if you will - were proven yesterday with the news that the ECB will pay £500,000 to the winners of next year's county championship.

Forgive my self-indulgence but on June 19 Dave "Nostradamus" Fulton wrote: "If a former player and occasional hack can throw a gauntlet down to an organisation as mighty and as rich as the ECB then here goes: ECB act now to demonstrate your commitment to the four-day game in this country by putting some proper prize money into the Championship. My suggestion is to pay half a million to the winner of the first division."

The fact the powers-that-be at cricket's HQ are obviously avid readers of this column and often use it for inspiration for future legislation has inspired me to make another prediction for the way forward for the county game.

Let's not moan and whinge about the weather let's do something about it. Let's move all 18 counties to southern Spain. Most county members are retired and would welcome the warmer weather, while the arid conditions should help the development of spin bowling.

Ok, I accept that should have stayed in my head rather than appearing on the page but it's there now.

Ambitions

On a more serious note I think the time has come for us to look at how bonus points are awarded in the county championship. Cricket, like most sports should have at its heart winning and losing yet this season counties have often sought to collect points rather than win games. There is nothing wrong with a drawn game if a team does its utmost to win it first, but too often a day's rain realises more modest ambitions.

As it currently stands there are a possible eight bonus points to glean from each game, five for batting (a score of 400 is needed inside 130 overs for full points) and three for bowling (one each for three, six and nine wickets inside 130 overs). There are a further four points on offer for a draw. Many sides would consider a drawn game where they take 12 points a very good week's work.

Indeed, looking at this year's table, a team taking 12 points per game would be leading the championship by 12 points, which means hypothetically a team could win the championship without winning a single match.

One hopes the £500k on offer to the winning side will encourage sides to play more positively. Just to be on the safe side I'd have 16 points for a win and three for a draw with six bonus points up for grabs. On the batting side I'd have points for reaching 200 and 300 and a further point for averaging four runs per over across the innings. For bowling: a point for three and six wickets and a point for bowling a side out inside 100 overs.

A winning team taking all six bonus points would earn 25 points, while nine would be the most a team could garner with a draw. The result ought to be positive cricket and - when rain intervenes for a significant period for example - imaginative captaincy.

For those who argue the standards of pitches will deteriorate as teams prepare result surfaces, I would counter by making sure Pitch Liason Officers (PLOs) have full power to dock points for poor pitches.

Twenty20 has taken the one-day game to a new level now it's time for the four-day game to adjust itself to the new pace of life. First-class cricket is designed to prepare players for the cut and thrust of a Test arena where winning matches not playing for points is the order of the day.

Comments

Darran Nicholas says...

whilst i am only 23, i have to agree with all of the points made above by Mr Fulton. though (seemingly unusually) i am a bit of a purist and i love the way the longer formats of the game are played, i agree that the game needs to evolve within the society it falls into. sadly, this means that there is little room for a slower more tactical form of gameplay, where the thrill of seeing wickets fall after hours of psychological (and sometimes phsyical) battle is seen as boring, however, this is no reason to write off the longer forms. i think the best point you make is that the county championship does not mirror the test arena closely enough. this has 2 problems. 1, the type of county player required is not so easily transferred to test match cricket, and 2, picking a test captain is made more difficult. as it is, we have a test captain who seems willing to take a gamble to win a match, but suppose KP had been seen as 'too brash' to be captain, which i personally thought upon the mere speculation of his appointment (don't get me wrong KP is a fantastic cricketer, and as a batsman i've never once even begun to question the man) then it would have been a tougher decision for the captaincy. however, the point is that cricket has found a new toy to play with, and it is immensely popular, somewhat like an action man figure, stick all the guns etc you want on him, but it will still sell, and i will not complain with more cricket coverage, but if the ECB are going to call a halt to Pro40, then the county championship needs a makeover too.

Posted 00:57 7th October 2008

Tom Barker says...

Agreed, the 4 day county game needs significant restructuring if it is to survive in the modern cricket climate and more positive play is the order of the day to keep fans interested and results more commonplace. However, as a Lancashire fan who inevitably suffer as much as any team with loss of time due to the weather, making the gap between a win and a draw even greater would only further the difficulty such sides have in mounting a realistic challenge for what should always remain the top prize of county cricket. Starting the season earlier when we invariably get some of the better weather of the year in most parts of the country and allowing for rescheduled matches I believe would produce more results and more exciting cricket matches and ultimately a more even playing field. (I appreciate that this year the weather has probably saved Lancashire more often than hindered them)

Posted 17:15 23rd September 2008

Trevor Gardner says...

spot on mr fulton ,with one amendment i do not agree and have been banging on to poeple that would listern why a team that loses should get any bonus points at all.

Posted 11:37 21st September 2008

Jamie Versey says...

Bang on the button Mr Fulton. Let's hope the powers that be do read your thoughts and make the move. Once the money men have had their fun and taken the sport for all they can all that'll be left is the "proper" cricket. Let''s safe guard real crickets future!

Posted 15:14 12th September 2008

Page 1 of 1

Add Comment*

All fields are required

Are you a Sky Sports subscriber?

Character Count : 0/1950

Please tick here if you wish to receive emails relating to Sky Sports.com or any other companies, services or products related to Sky Sports.com

Please send me the weekly Sky Sportszine - exclusive content, features and competitions to my inbox every Friday.

*All fields required, your email address will be kept private