Ponting fury at time-wasting

Aussie skipper livid after Strauss and co escape with draw

  • Ponting: Anger at England's tactics at Cardiff
They can play whatever way they want to play. We have come to play by the rules and the spirit of the game, and it is up to them to do what they want to do.

Ponting on England tactics
Quotes of the week

  • LIVE ON SKY SPORTS Watch the second Test from Lord's live on Sky Sports 1 and HD1 from 10am on Thursday. You can also follow the match with live commentary on skysports.com as well as on Sky Player.

Australia captain Ricky Ponting blasted England's gamesmanship after they left Cardiff with a nailbiting draw in the first Ashes Test.

Although he insisted it would be forgotten as the tourists head for the second Test at Lord's, Ponting was incensed by England's time-wasting tactics with last-pair James Anderson and Monty Panesar at the crease.

Twice during a 69-ball stand of defiance, England 12th man Bilal Shafayat ran onto the field to offer Anderson batting gloves while physio Steve McCaig was ushered off by the disgruntled Australians on the second occasion.

After England secured a first Test stalemate at 6.41pm on the final evening, just 13 runs in front with one wicket intact, Ponting said: "I don't think that was required.

"He had changed his gloves the over before and his glove is not going to be too sweaty in one over.

"I am not sure what the physio was doing out there - I didn't see him call for any physio to come out. As far as I am concerned it was pretty ordinary, actually.

"They can play whatever way they want to play. We have come to play by the rules and the spirit of the game, and it is up to them to do what they want to do."

No further action will be taken it appears but there will need to be some peace deals made if the series is to maintain respectable relations between the Ashes rivals.

Unhappy

"I was unhappy with it but I don't want to make that big a deal about it," he said.

"I am sure others will be taking it up with the England hierarchy as they should. But it is not the reason we didn't win. I won't think about it again when we leave here."

Two other conflicts earlier in the day suggested things were on the verge of boiling over.

In the warm-ups, Kevin Pietersen and Mitchell Johnson got in a heated exchange and Stuart Broad and Peter Siddle were involved in an on-field altercation.

However, Ponting played down the significance of each exchange.

Of the pre-play clash, he said: "It was a case of few guys on the ground taking each others' space."

Umpire Billy Doctrove addressed the physical contact, which occurred when Broad was running past bowler Siddle.

"He handled it and got on top of it pretty quickly," Ponting said. "I don't think it was that significant and if there had been anything in it I would have been spoken to on the field.

"It was probably accidental. Move on. It was a great game of cricket and we should be remembering that."

Paul Collingwood's gritty 74, which spanned close to six hours, proved the cornerstone of England's rearguard and somehow dragged the hosts to the brink of salvation from 70 to five, requiring 239 runs to make Australia bat again.

"He deserves a pat on the back. Without his innings England would have been in a whole lot of trouble," Ponting reflected.

Ponting's counterpart Strauss agreed and added: "There was a huge amount of relief in the dressing room and a lot of pride in how those guys played and how Colly, Graeme Swann and 'Fred' (Andrew Flintoff) played - the second half of the order really stood up to be counted," admitted Strauss.

"There is a lot of pride in what they achieved, but more than anything there was relief in getting through the game and we're still 0-0 going into the Lord's Test match.

"We are relieved we came away with a draw, but we're not going to pretend we're happy with the way we performed this week. We were down on where we needed to be and Australia showed us they're going to be a tough nut to crack and we need to get better."

Comments (117)

Bill Sherman says...

Ricky Ponting needs to get his own house in order. Once, the bowlers/fielders only appealed if the batsman had ACTUALLY done something to warrant an appeal. Not now, with these AUSSIE CHEATS. The bowler appealed for LBW, against Collingwood, with the ball going way outside the line of stumps, then that cheat , PONTING, decides to appeal for a catch even though it was clear the ball had gone nowhere near the bat, What about this sportsmanship you said you wanted to play by then, PONTING.

Posted 07:02 14th July 2009

Vis Sharma says...

Ponting talked about england's gamesmanship at Cardiff, did he forget his team's gamesmanship when india tour to australia in 08 the sydney test. In my view when they do things like that its good but when others tries to do so even a little , they can't take it . If ricky wants to prove anything he should prove on the field not off the field. For engl;and pietersen should look to play more watchful and put harmison in the squad and put broad

Posted 06:28 14th July 2009

Kaisar Altaf says...

England will not win the Ashes!! All England talked about before the start of the series is Aussie ain't got no McGrath and no Warne, whilst watching the match the England¿s batting facial expressions where like 'this is easy they don't have no bowler that can trouble us anymore', the teams mentality is totally wrong. England will not with this ashes series, the simple reason being that this team hasn¿t got the mental strength and skill to beat the Aussies! Also these players are on central contracts, they have all the BEST facilities in the world and they should be dismantling teams around the world, however there not! why aren¿t they, what¿s wrong, Flintoff amazing player however what has he done in the past 2 year... answer NOTHING, BELL in the squad...WHY he hasn't proved nothing in the past year too? MONTY.. WHY select a bowler who has stopped taking wickets, it¿s obvious that the selectors ain¿t GOT NO CLUE, if they did have ENGLAND would be far the best team in the world, all the selectors are more concerned about HOW MUCH THEY GET PAID from the ECB for Selecting BIG name players that CAN'T perform anymore!!!!! Ask yourself the question, whose got the best training facilities in the World = ENGLAND, who has the best analysis in the world = ENGLAND, who has the best paid wage structure for professional international players = ENGLAND, so WHY isn¿t TEAM ENGLAND the best in the world!!! Answer = SELECTORS haven¿t got a MONKEYS!!!

Posted 00:04 14th July 2009

Mushtaq Ahmad says...

Half the England team needs to be replaced. Some of them should be in Big Brother not in the national team. Flintoff is one of the best players but too spoilt and it is too late to expect he will ever show his full talent and ever take place among best players in history. Broad and Cook's space I already mentioned above. Harmison is a fired cartridge. Give someone else a chance. Why Napier not being given chance. Someone is worried, he will take permanent space. Strauss is a week captain. Team needs new players. Some players are being given too many chances. There should be a limit as it is a national team not academy.

Posted 22:15 13th July 2009

Robert Matthews says...

Typical of the ausies, they don't like the same thing done to them, they would be the first to use every means they could to win or benefit themselves. WELL DONE England we are behind you 100%

Posted 21:52 13th July 2009

Gordon Batt says...

In every other sporting code the umpires/referees have the power to impose penalties for cheating and for time wasting. Australia should have been given extra overs to compensate for the cowardly conduct and for the highly implausible explanation given . We are not stupid, you know ! Let this test go down in the annals of cricketing history as the one which led to the tightening of the rules to ensure fair play.

Posted 21:16 13th July 2009

Ben Green says...

The australians are "whiners" when they lose and "gloaters" when they win. They always, with their colonial "chip" take any comment as critism. I lived there for ten years and with them it was "We've got - best beer in the world, best army, best music" etc.. arrogance personified, sad but true.

Posted 19:56 13th July 2009

Sam Belt says...

I actually felt embarrassed - just play the game, I had faith in the last two bats to stick it out - shame others didnt!!

Posted 19:36 13th July 2009

Tony Holmes says...

Ponting unhappy with England time-wasting? Mmmmm, just remind me, which of the Chappell brothers was it bowled underarm along the ground at the end of a game?! (and had they transferred out of Australia for the day?)

Posted 16:36 13th July 2009

Laurie Stewart says...

Time wasting. You have all missed the point. The umpires are no longer in charge. If they had been one of the English or Australian umpires of 20 years ago the interlopers would have been shunted off the pitch double quick. Would Sheperd or Bird have had any of that ? Nah. Remember the (think it was Indian test with England) the umpires continued in near darkness, after time wasting, until England scored the winning runs. Easy to remedy. Stop the clock for each interuption. Plus they have to get the umpire in the pavilion's permission to set foot on the field. Laurie

Posted 16:08 13th July 2009

David May says...

Could you ask the trumpeter on your news bulletin to hold a concert outside of the hotel for the Aussies on Wednesday night. Ponting couldn't even see the funny side, SAD O

Posted 16:02 13th July 2009

Lilian Edwards says...

I agree with Ponting, the English players are inclined to delay, and drag their feet as much as possible. It is VERY noticable. This not only gives us a bad name as sportsmen but makes it incredibly boring and frustrating to watch. Why are they not penalised for it as they are in the one dayers? Thank goodness we have players like Collingwood, who actually make an effort.

Posted 15:36 13th July 2009

Mark Jones says...

It just amazes me that we Brits get really excited about losing or even drawing a match...why is the British mentality one of loving losers?? how poor is this?? The facts of the first test simply were that we were not good enough, we have a mediocre team and will be beaten by the Aussies in this series as they are just so much better than us in all departments - the body language on the field was poor, nobody really looked as if they were remotely interested. Come on England show some grit and determination!! and come out fighting at Lords...

Posted 15:23 13th July 2009

Ahmed Ismail says...

Last year¿s Sydney test match between India and Australia will go down as one of the most controversial test matches in history.and ricky ponting was the main cause bringing the spirit of the game into question again and again.they are the biggest cheats in cricket if you saw that series you know what im talking about.cmon england

Posted 15:00 13th July 2009

Sha Z says...

Ricky was very easy going on that matter and he was right to do so. When i was watching the match, anderson had just changed his gloves and i dont think he would have needed to change it again after 1 over so their main aim was obviously to waste time, had it been someone else they wouldve have talked with the umpire straight away but ricky didnt. All you England fans are being so defensive and critising pointing while he is such as great guy. The simple fact is that ENGLAND WAS CELEBRATING A DRAW which tells you everything, Australia completley outplayed them in their batting but the nature of the game was against them, cause if did get the 2nd innings they would have won but thanks to some time wasting australia didnt get a chance to do so. Pointing is an awesome captain and a player, and just cause England won ashes once in a million years doesnt mean you are better than Australia cause they are in a different league to England, remmember 2007 ashes, 5-0

Posted 14:36 13th July 2009

Paul Stafford says...

The Aussies played really well - England played very poorly, so a draw means that if England can improve ( and lets face it, they can't get worse ) they can beat the Aussies fairly easily. So come on ENGLAND cheer up the country by stuffing the Aussies for the second time in four years.

Posted 14:13 13th July 2009

Reece K says...

Well now that the match is over it was great to see that the series is bringing alot of great cricket, don't really agree with Ricky but understand his disapointment but Think its a little rich calling Aussie's wingers when he is just stating a point, however do think its winging when certain comentators claim that for some reason the poor english team have picked a ball that doesn't swing or move off the seam. Pot calling the kettle Black

Posted 14:05 13th July 2009

Emma Williamson says...

Come on England fans! If you look at what Ponting said, he is actually quite easy going about the matter. The fact is, in relaity, we lost by an innings and are likely to be 4-0 down by the end of this (assuming the weather does not save us again). If all we can shout about is this draw then English cricket has some serious issues!

Posted 13:57 13th July 2009

Alan Johannes says...

As usual, armchair-bound aussie-hating 'skippers' abound. Ponting was quite within his rights to make the remarks he did and comparatively restrained in the way he talked about it afterwards. He admitted that the timewasting (which it clearly was), wasn't why his team didn't win and that It had been, 'a great game of cricket'. Fact #1 - It took nearly two full English innings to match the run total achieved by Australia for the loss of only six wickets. Fact #2 - (closely connected to Fact #1) Australia took 19 wickets, England only 6. Fact #3 - (closely connected to Facts 1 & 2) England are very lucky to be going to Lord's on even terms and only someone whose view is obscured by blind hatred for all things Australian would think otherwise.

Posted 13:55 13th July 2009

Alan Pearson says...

Yes the Aussies have tried similar tricks and would probably have tried again if the positions had been reversed but please stop creditting them with all that is wrong with cricket, such as 'sledging'. In the 1950'sI remember as a 12 & 13 year old playing for a colliery welfare team, in County Durham, having to suffer a form of sledging while batting. This happened at times when I wasn't even selected for the team but gone along as scorer. This was quite obvious to the opposition as I had no 'whites' or boots and sent in to bat at 10 or 11 had to suffer all kinds of verbal abuse.

Posted 13:47 13th July 2009

Add Comment*

Send us your views

Are you a Sky Sports subscriber?

*All fields required, your email address will be kept private