Skip to content

Ben Stokes trial: Jury retires to consider verdict for England cricketer

Stokes left out of England's squad for third Test against India while trial is ongoing

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Geraint Hughes outlines what to expect at Bristol Crown Court on Tuesday, as the jury in Ben Stokes' trial for affray is sent out to consider a verdict

The jury in the trial of England cricketer Ben Stokes has retired to consider its verdict.

The 27-year-old - along with Ryan Ali, 28 - both deny a charge of affray after an incident outside Bristol nightclub Mbargo on 25 September.

Hales may have caused injuries, court told

Stokes' defence lawyer suggests that some of Ryan Ali's injuries may have been caused by fellow cricketer Alex Hales.

Prosecutors have said Stokes played a "greater role" in the violence, while the defence said claims the cricketer was enraged are "absolute nonsense" and suggested he might not be responsible for the full extent of Ali's injuries.

Stokes has admitted throwing punches at Ryan Ali and Ryan Hale, but said it was in defence of two gay men they were abusing - as well as his own self-defence.

The trial, at Bristol Crown Court, heard the exact start to the violence is unknown but that Ali had swung a beer bottle at England cricketer Alex Hales - who was out with Stokes.

Ali is then said to have delivered a glancing blow to the shoulder of one of the gay men.

Ryan Ali arrives at Bristol Crown Court - he has been accused of affray
Image: Ryan Ali denies a charge of affray

Stokes is accused of knocking Ali to the floor and knocking him unconscious, with a video apparently showing Mr Hales kicking his head and stamping on him.

Alex Hales was interviewed by police but never arrested or charged.

Ali suffered a fractured eye socket in the incident and has said he still suffers problems with his vision.

He was also left with swelling on his eye, a laceration above his eyebrow, a cracked tooth and a bruise behind his ear.

But in closing speeches on Monday, the lawyer for Stokes, Gordon Cole QC, questioned whether his client had caused the injuries given Alex Hales' alleged involvement, saying the evidence was "ambiguous".

He asked the jury to carefully consider video of the incident recorded by a student from his bedroom window.

"You will see Mr Hales on one occasion appearing to kick," said Mr Cole. "So, when the prosecution seeks to hang all the blame at Ben Stokes's door by saying he rendered people unconscious, just look at what happened."

He added: "Does it follow that all of these injuries are properly attributed to Ben Stokes? We say no. We say that the evidence is ambiguous. We say how do you resolve that?"

during the 3rd Royal London ODI match between England and Australia at Trent Bridge on June 19, 2018 in Nottingham, England.
Image: Alex Hales was questioned but never arrested or charged

Ali's lawyer, Anna Midgley, in her closing address to the jury, said her client had acted in response to a threat when he had swung the bottle.

"Of course, watching himself brandishing a bottle makes him feel regret and embarrassment, let alone when the world is watching," she said.

"But regret for how he behaved is a different question as to whether he has committed a criminal offence."

In his summing up, the judge also acknowledged the jury might be wondering why they had not heard evidence from the gay couple Stokes said he was protecting.

He told them: "It's for the prosecution and defence as to what evidence is presented" and there was "no place for guessing or speculating."

The case against Ryan Hale was dismissed last week because of insufficient evidence.

Stokes has been left out of England's squad for the third Test against India while the trial is ongoing.

Around Sky