Skip to content

The Open: Jon Rahm in Royal Birkdale rules controversy

Jon Rahm of Spain hits his tee shot on the 1st hole during a practice round prior to the 146th Open
Image: Jon Rahm eventually signed for a one-under 69 in the first round of The Open

Jon Rahm was at the centre of a rules controversy for the second time in less than a fortnight on the first day of The Open at Royal Birkdale.

The Spaniard was penalised two shots on the 17th for moving a plant close to his ball but later had the strokes restored after rules officials accepted his explanation that his lie was not improved.

Personalise your Sky Sports app
Personalise your Sky Sports app

The new Sky Sports app is here - and you can filter notifications to receive the alerts you want!

It meant the 22-year-old was able to sign for the one-under-par 69 that he shot rather than the one-over score that was initially indicated when he completed his round.

The incident came after a similar brush with authority during the final round of his successful charge to victory at the Irish Open at Portstewart earlier this month. On that occasion, Rahm was found to have incorrectly replaced his ball on the sixth green but he was later cleared of any wrongdoing.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Rich Beem gives his take on the incident involving Jon Rahm during the final round of the Irish Open

On this occasion, Rahm moved what he felt was dead vegetation, which would have been classed as a loose impediment, only for playing partner Lee Westwood to point out it was something growing.

Rahm, who birdied the 17th after finding the green with that second shot, said: "I don't know what to call the plants - the one with the thorns in it, about three feet long - it was just right over my ball.

"I thought it was a loose impediment because it looked dead so I just moved it to the side. That is when Lee came. He realised it was not loose, it was still attached.

Also See:

"We asked the rules official. He said improving my lie by moving an impediment that was not loose was a two-stroke penalty.

"That is what we agreed on. They said it was a two-stroke penalty and we were going to review the footage afterwards.

"Unfortunately for me I was the only one that saw it, there were no cameras to back me up.

The Open Live

"But it was never on my lie, never on my line, never on my swing path. It was not going to bother me anyway.

"I explained my version of what happened. Basically, after that they made the decision there was no stroke penalty."

Rahm spent a considerable amount of time in the recorder's office after his round but, after being cleared again, said he would have respected a decision either way.

He said: "At the end of the day, it is not my call. It is up to them. They did say it was a very fine line but the decision is up to them. I would have been fine with whatever."

Watch The 146th Open throughout the week live on Sky Sports - your home of golf

Around Sky