Sky Sports.com

Special features

Blogs & Opinion

Mike Atherton:

Recent Comments:

Darren Kok on Mind the gap

"As much as I would love to see England smash the Aussies, I still think the Aussies have the edge over the English. People talk about them losing Hayden, Martin, Langer etc.. yet they ... " View all comments

Ritesh Lamsal on Time's right for Ravi

"There are five problems with England currently : 1) Hyper passive captain in Strauss, 2) Inexperienced head coach in Flower, 3) The brute attack of injuries (Harmison, Sidebottom, ... " View all comments

Stress-buster Strauss

KP conundrum the first thing in new captain's inbox

Mike Atherton Posted 8th January 2009 view comments

The events of the past few days can be traced back to five months ago when Kevin Pietersen got the job.

Was he actually the right man to captain England? I have to say at the time I did think it was a big gamble, but once he took the role on, you have to say he made a good fist of it.

I thought he made an excellent start and even though he didn't win a game, I really thought the tour of India was a triumph for Pietersen as a captain.

Pietersen & Strauss: mutual need

Pietersen & Strauss: mutual need

But the problems that have come to a head this week were already in place. It kind of leaked out after the New Zealand series that there was a problem between Pietersen and Peter Moores, but in India it was said that Pietersen was a bit miffed about the lack of support he got in Chennai when they failed to defend that total.

Things clearly degenerated from then on and although it wasn't obvious to outsiders, you do hear whispers about discontent. Well, this week it has become clear that things had reached a head and Pietersen, rightly or wrongly, felt that the England team was not going to progress with Moores in charge.

Admittedly, Strauss does not have Pietersen's star quality or presence and he certainly doesn't have his intuitive brilliance as a player, but he is a decent, sensible lad with a good cricketing brain. He has a nice manner about him, he is a proper professional and he works hard, trains hard and will set a good example on the practice field.

Michael Atherton
Quotes of the week

These things happen in sport and in life. But you have to try and resolve them in private because the moment the rest of the team realise that the coach and the captain are not getting on very well it will have a negative impact.

The captain and coach are always going to have disagreements but hopefully they can work through them - in private - and pull in the same direction for the benefit of the England cricket team.

That clearly wasn't going to happen with Pietersen and Moores, which is why English cricket has had such a tumultuous two days - and why the ECB have now turned to Andrew Strauss.

Professional

It is too easy to say that there was no-one else in a position to do the job and when push came to shove, Strauss was the only candidate.

I will tell you now he is a very capable candidate indeed. He has captained England before and done it very well and although the one-day side is a different issue, he is a permanent fixture in the England Test team.

I actually felt he was unlucky not to get the job when Michael Vaughan stepped down and certainly for the last Ashes series in Australia when Vaughan was injured and it went to Andrew Flintoff.

Admittedly, Strauss does not have Pietersen's star quality or presence and he certainly doesn't have his intuitive brilliance as a player, but he is a decent, sensible lad with a good cricketing brain. He has a nice manner about him, he is a proper professional and he works hard, trains hard and will set a good example on the practice field.

He is very fit, he looks after himself and he is pretty much unflappable. He has lots of qualities that should stand him in good stead, but of course as England captain he is going to need more than that.

The first thing he will need is to sort the Kevin Pietersen situation out.

It is not unusual for an England captain to step down and continue to play for the side - I did it myself - but this is different to anything we've ever seen before. Pietersen will find himself walking back into a group of players that, when push came to shove, did not support him.

Mistaken

That is going to be difficult for him and will be the first thing in the Strauss inbox, if you like, because there is genuine division in the camp, a real split in opinion. Hugh Morris found that out when he started to canvas player opinion about Moores. Pietersen, it seems, was clearly mistaken.

That will be hard for him to have realised and hard to deal with when he does walk back in to the fold, but what Strauss will not lose sight of is the fact that England need Pietersen - and he needs England. Once that is established we can all move on and I do think England will.

In any team I have played in not everyone has got on; it's the same in any walk of life, people aren't always going to like each other, simple as that. But the key thing from here on in is that everyone in the England set-up respects one another and they are all focussed on doing the best thing for England, which is winning cricket matches.

The one person I have genuine sympathy for in all this is Peter Moores.

I think he has conducted himself with a tremendous amount of dignity over these past few days. He has kept his counsel and has just gone about his business like the decent man he clearly is.

I don't know the ins and outs of him as a coach, but I do know all he was really guilty of was suffering a breakdown in the one relationship he couldn't afford to suffer - the one with his captain.

England now need a new coach for the next couple of months and that man might well be Andy Flower. He has international experience but whether he will want to put his name forward for the full-time role remains to be seen.

Ensconsed

What I do know is that whoever gets the job, it will be done differently to last time. Don't forget Peter Moores was shooed in once Duncan Fletcher had gone, an inside appointment if you like, but that will not happen again.

It will be opened up for applications, and I suppose the usual candidates will be mentioned and will all apply.

Graham Ford was being talked about, but only in conjunction with Pietersen, so that now looks unlikely;Tom Moody is a lot of people's favourite but is firmly ensconsed in Western Australia and it is probably too early for someone like Ashley Giles.

It is difficult right now to think outside the box and come up with a candidate or two.

I will resist the suggestion put forward of an Hussain-Botham-Willis triumverate of power and if I had to throw one name into the ring, maybe Darren Lehmann's will come into the equation.

He is young, he knows the English set-up well, knows our players well and is well-liked over here. Then again, the same can be said of a certain Shane Warne!

I am sure there will be plenty of people interested because the Englanjd job is still a very, very attractive job for anyone in world cricket.

And I do not buy into all this talk of England shooting themselves in the foot either.

I would rather this sort of thing came out and was dealt with now rather than it blowing up in our faces in four months' time when England - Kevin Pietersen et al - are trying to win back the Ashes.

Comments (17)

  • Page 1 of 1
  • 1

J Butt says...

Like to see Struss made permanent captain of both forms and Cook Vice captain of test matches.

Posted 17:48 20th January 2009

Laurence Bickers says...

What we have here is something very typically English in dealing with an outstanding talent. It is so unusual for us to have such an exceptional player with a built in winning mentality as KP that it is difficult for us to cope with it. All KP has done in a typical non-English way (as he is) is to say things are not going well - we have a workmanlike coach focussing on physical fitness rather than bringing people on and we have very serious underperformance from our players - in particular Bell, Harmisson and Monty. He put forward a way to get us out of this mess by bringing in a coach with the right mentality. The powers that be were totally non-plussed for several weeks. "Oh we can't have that - one of the employees telling us how to run the show- doesn't he understand that the English way is to lose gratefully and learn to say well played to your opponents" and the players said "I don't mind the fitness regime as long as I keep getting paid and don't have a performance bonus bulit into my cushy contract", and of course KP gets sacked. He must be absolutely bewildered. How typically English. You would not have got this in Australia. The discussion would be about how to get the side winning again. Politics is politics but who cares! At the end of the day it's the team's results that matter not who runs it whether its the ECB, coach or captain.

Posted 11:49 11th January 2009

Scott Mc donnell says...

i think england need kp in charge of england. yes he is arrogant and cocky and knows what he can do on a field and he certainly does. englands best batsmen by a clear mile and despite losing in india i think he is more than capable of leading a team like that into a big test series as the ashes

Posted 00:55 11th January 2009

Vinay Sf says...

Im no cricket expert but I have noticed over the past few years that the most successful captains are those with the most tactical knowledge, not the most extravagant personality; I honestly believe the ECB chose Pietersen simply to raise the profile of cricket in the UK, much in the same way as India tried to do with Tendulkar on more than one occasion. Struss is a good choice, but i believe the ECB missed a trick with Rob Key - why he hasnt been at the very least a part of the squad for the last 3-4 years is beyond me.

Posted 22:11 10th January 2009

Ken Bhatt says...

I welcome Strauss as new captain,But not with Aussies as coach Why not Some one from Indian, They have best ex-players in country no 2 in Ranking Produce best players in country, Successful ICL cricket, without Discriminating ECB must think this first. As England young cricketer are Losing Interest

Posted 15:13 10th January 2009

Toqir Khalid says...

I personally feel that Strauss should have been given the captaincy when Vaughan left, and let KP concentrate on his batting. It's disappointing that things which should have been private matters within the team have been leaked into the public media. Playing club cricket, there were numerous times when I didn't agree with my captain, or the coach for that matter. But at the end of the day, as a team we got on with things and played cricket. I hope that Strauss does a good job of captaining the England team, as he has the skills to do well. Hopefully Strauss, KP, Flintoff, et al will be in top form for the ashes. Looking forward to a great summer of cricket!

Posted 13:28 10th January 2009

Cindy Soffe says...

The main blame for this debacle lies with the ECB. Knee-jerk reactions are seldom successful and here we go again. OK so Strauss will probably make a reasonably good Test captain but how can the Selectors dream of him, even temporarily, as ODI/T20 captain when he really is not a good player of the short form? Why don't they start to broaden their horizons and select some of the excellent young players within County Cricket, with the aim of building a strong team for the future - like for instance S Africa, Australia and India have done? They simply must learn that we need very strong batting openers capable of big boundaries, not the usual Test side of Cook, Strauss, Bell et al, good though they may be for Tests. Time to replace the Selectors instead of captains and coaches!

Posted 12:18 10th January 2009

Oliver Leopard says...

Athers, you make somuch sense so often and I totally agree with you. It is such a shame that this has happened as KP potentially has the swagger needed to take england forward but as a player not a captain. Yeah give the lad a chance but why didn;t the rift between Moores and KP get sorted out. In my honest opinion, put Vaughan as coach. No-one has donemore for England on the field as Vaughan has over the last 10 years. Just give someone an ear piece on the field and job done. Actually Alistair Cook would do. Upstairs has got to be more public and listen to the people (athers included)

Posted 02:11 10th January 2009

Dan Reddyhough says...

Spot on Athers - as usual I might add. Pietersen was performing well in the role and there will always be conflicts of personality, but he did let himself down at the end regretfully. I'm not sure Moores is quite as blameless as it appears, I think there is more to his involvement than meets the eye, but you can't fault his conduct over the last week. Strauss I believe will do fine and I would be happy to see him in charge across the board - I do think that is the preference. In ODI cricket he is best suited to a floating lower middle order role, as he is capable of coming in at 5 if we have a shaky start requiring someone to stick around and 7 if the bigger hitters need to accelerate - but he can always tick the board over in this slot. To be fair if you are looking for 6, 7 or 8 to win you a game of T20 the game is lost! Heads down and bums up over the next 4 months - all as you say is not lost!

Posted 16:46 9th January 2009

Gareth Sumner says...

In retrospect, it would have been better to let KP do the ODI job, and Strauss the Tests. May as well let Flintoff have another go at captaining the ODI team, although Strauss coming in for Bell wouldn't do any harm at all.

Posted 15:01 9th January 2009

Subramani Aiyar says...

Kevin Pietersen is one of the best batsmen in the world. He is indispensable for England in their quest for Ashes glory come June this year. But like many greats in the past he appears to be arrogant because of what he has achieved so far in international cricket. In fact I thought he had this streak from the very day he joined the English team. While this may be needed to counter the likes of Steve Waugh's and Ricky Ponting's Australians, I am not too sure if captains need this abraisive trait. The Worrells and the Benauds, the Mays and the Brearleys achieved much as captains of their respective teams while being calm and gentlemanly in their demeanour on the field. In fact they used to come across as leaders, who were in control all the time. Pietersen's place in history is assured for his having brought back the English team to India after aving witnessed the Mumbai mayhem, and as a batsman. But I was never convinced that he would be a good captain. In fact when Vaughn resigned, I had wanted Strauss as captain. He has the personality, the composure and the playing skills that a captain needs to be respected by his team mates. Besides and that is very important I think he is lucky like Brearley was. Even if the circumstances leading to his appointment may have been unfortunate, I think Andrew Strauss will bring glory to this English team of very good players. The Panesars and the Harmisons will now show the world the stuff they are made of.

Posted 14:43 9th January 2009

Upendra Patel says...

Nowadays cricket is commercial and roving company. But the ingredients of cricket is enjoyment, recreational pleasure and above all a game played in true spirit of sports. the issue should never be in locker room. No individual playing for country should brought into this incident. Both the coach and the captain should be fired for long time. Inject new fresh players and develop them to old days of cricket playing spirit and gamesmanship. No COACh but MANAGER only to the captain. The captain does not have to be best bowler or batasman or fielder but shrewd and knowledgeable cricket player. All big headed players should be sacked.

Posted 13:29 9th January 2009

Gary Wolno says...

I believe that the English Team needed someone like KP to lead the team! In character I believe he is similar to Graham Smith, arrogant and confident! Look at how well Graham has led the South African team over recent times. He has developed into a great leader and if KP was given the chance then he too could have led England in similar fashion. But, alas the stuck up English could not change their old school thinking and have now lost possibly the one person who could save English cricket from mediocrity! The England team need a leader with balls and brains and I feel KP had both! Hopefully he will not be lost completely as that would leave Flintoff left as England's only world class player!

Posted 13:16 9th January 2009

David Groth says...

Your on the money again Athers and I agree that Strauss should have taken over from Vaughan. Pietersen was just too inexperienced and would have benefitted with a few years of test cricket before being appointed. You diplomatically avoid blaming the powers that be, but in truth, they are in no small measure to blame for this fiasco. I can't help thinking that until the administrators are replaced with real quality ,English cricketing turmoil will continue unabated. Some of the best candidates are conspicuous by there absence, but I suppose it's all about money and job satisfaction. It is of great concern that the players themselves have become polarised over the KP/Moores debacle, and this issue must be Strauss's prime task to resolve, otherwise the Ashes are destined to remain in Aussie hands. Thanks for your articles, never dull and always thought provoking.

Posted 09:27 9th January 2009

Shaji Geevarghese says...

Strauss is the obvious choice from within the present team . But the selectors appear quite short sighted . They should be thinking outside the box . Rob Key would be the ideal choice . The chance was missed last time when Pitersen was appointed . Atleast Key should have been drafted into the team as a player at that time . Perhaps atleast in the immediate future this could be done . With Strauss just back in form after a long slump it is unfair to further stress him with captaincy .Key enjoys captaincy and he is proved it in all forms of the game . Key is the lost key to eventual English success

Posted 08:16 9th January 2009

Andre Barnard says...

Surely, the dressing room is going to be a very lonely place for KP. To have thought (arrogantly I must say) that you have the backing of all your team mates and then to find out you are going to sit in the corner and keep your mouth shut. Something KP cant do, not from his South African days as a school boy up till when he saw himself as the Savior of English cricket. All the best to Straussie even if only to show the world that ALL South African borns are not egoistic selcentered bombastic individuals.

Posted 07:33 9th January 2009

Chris Cole says...

Another great piece from Athers, and i agree entirely with Strauss as captain, he should have got it after Vaughan left. The KP issue does bring up one area that is rarely mentioned - the fact that supposed big personalities very rarely make good England captains. In KP's case it may have been a touch of megalomania over the Moores saga that brought about his resignation, but even though a captain in cricket is vastly more important than in other sports, the manager or coach should still have the ultimate say in matters both on and off the field.

Posted 21:36 8th January 2009

  • Page 1 of 1
  • 1

back to top

Other Cricket Experts:

Latest Posts in Cricket:

David Lloyd

Stars in their eyes

From karaoke with Bob Willis to Countdown with Susie Dent, it's been another lively week for Bumble......

5 comments

Mike Atherton

Don't get caught cold

Mike Atherton warns England to expect some frenetic and tough warm-up games in South Africa....

1 comments

Benedict Bermange

Love actualities?

If the answer is yes then crikey, are you in for a treat with Benedict Bermange's South African tour statistics!...

0 comments

Latest News RSS feeds

Denly hails Strauss influence

Joe Denly paid tribute to Andrew Strauss after both openers enjoyed a productive day in England's win over the Warriors.

Strauss stars in England win

Skipper Andrew Strauss hit an unbeaten 117 as England cruised to an eight-wicket win over the Warriors in Kimberley.

Aussies wrap up series win

Australia cruised to a six-wicket win in the sixth One Day International to take an unassailable 4-2 lead in the seven-match series.

Taibu ton in vain

Tatenda Taibu's century failed to prevent Zimbabwe slipping to a 45-run defeat against South Africa in the first one-day international.

Kiwis in no rush over coach

New Zealand are hoping to have a new coach in place by the end of the year with several leading names in the frame.

Features

Affinity and beyond

Affinity and beyond

Andy Flower talks about his early ties to South Africa as England prepare to take on the Proteas.

Strauss under stress

Strauss under stress

Winning the Ashes has raised the stakes for Andrew Strauss in South Africa this winter, says Michael Vaughan.

Pulling closer

Pulling closer

Yuvraj Singh has closed the gap on Sky Sports International Sixes League leader Chris Gayle.