Kevin Pietersen's recent comments about England players missing out on the IPL may have irritated a few England followers, and I can certainly see why.
As England captain, I pushed for central contracts and since they have been in place England players have been really well looked after by the ECB.
And with important times ahead for England, just a year away from the Ashes, people may have been annoyed by Pietersen's remarks.
Net interest: Pietersen takes a break from net practice
Let's make one thing clear though, I've seen Kevin Pietersen in practice and his commitment and willingness to put everything into his game is never in doubt for me. He will make sure for himself that he will be doing as much as possible to be right for a Test match.
I would never ever doubt that even if he did go off and play in the IPL - he would still be doing whatever possible to be right for a Test match.
The ECB have been very fair and generous with the England players and, as a player, I don't think you can have it all ways.
Nasser Hussain
Quotes of the week
Click here for live listings
But England have to make sure that Kevin Pietersen is right for a Test match and that's why central contracts were brought in.
England need to be able to turn to Pietersen, a player who was complaining a few months ago about being burnt out and tired, and make sure that he is given time off to rest - and that's what Peter Moores will do.
Balance
I'm more concerned for Moores and England and how they make sure players are given the right balance between rest and play.
Some of these players want it in all directions - to play international cricket, but also to be associated with their counties so they can have a massive benefit after 10 years, and now the IPL - but you can't have it all ways.
If you look at the injury crisis over the last two or three years there is a list of players: Marcus Trescothick, Michael Vaughan, Simon Jones and Andrew Flintoff to name a few and they've all been well looked after - and have been paid while injured.
That's what you get when you are under a central contract. The ECB have been very fair and generous with the England players and, as a player, I don't think you can have it all ways.
On the other hand, they can rightly turn round and say 'it's unfair, how come the New Zealand boys, the West Indies boys and other international cricketers are able to take part in the IPL?'
But you have to remember that other nations' cricketers aren't paid as well as England are. New Zealand players are not paid nearly as much as England's and they have to go off and find other ways of earning extra money.
I do have a lot of sympathy for the star players, like Pietersen in particular, when he sees lesser names in the game able to cash in on such big bonanzas from the IPL.
A lot of players will think 'crikey look what he's earning, and what's he done in the game, look what I have achieved and I'm not able to cash in?' But why have you been able to achieve in the game? Because England have looked after you, that's the bottom line.
England have looked after them when they are injured and when they are out of form - they have as much backroom staff to help them as any other team.
Decisions
In the end you have to be grown up and make a decision. The likes of Pietersen and Flintoff will have to sit down when their next contract is awarded and talk about what they want: do they want the money from the IPL or do they want to be under a central contract with England with all the luxuries that that brings them?
This might be more of an issue for county cricket. Are some players going to slog it out for six months for 60 grand when they can earn twice that amount for five weeks in India?
The players that aren't centrally contracted, like Dimitri Mascarenhas who will be the only England player in the IPL, may cause more of an issue for their county.
I know it must be really tempting for England players - if I was in that position looking over at some of the unknown names that are on vast sums of money it must be very tempting indeed.
I am slightly more in favour with the ECB but I do sympathise with the players also. The fans want England players to concentrate on being in perfect shape for that first Ashes Test next year and everything else will follow from that.
The ECB should review this situation, of course. I believe they should review it every month and constantly speak to their players - they have to look after their interests and make sure they are happy.
They should try and make sure that in the future the star names can go over to India and play in the IPL but it just might not be at the moment.
Do you agree with Nasser Hussain? Send us your thoughts using the feedback form below
Comments (7)
- Page 1 of 1
- 1
Chris G says...
I think the ECB's reluctance to accomodate the IPL comes more from a fear of lost revenue and power rather than a wish to protect English players and help them prepare for the ashes! Since the final ashes match in Jan2007, England have played far more cricket than almost any other country earning the ECB plenty of money. So I don't feel as if the players owe the ECB anything (except perhaps Harmison but that's a different story). You usually need happy players to form a happy team. And hence I would like the ECB to let our best players go to the IPL in future seasons and top-up their relatively meger £200k central contracts.
Posted 13:19 15th April 2008
John Richards says...
Players shoud be allowed to ply their trade; the gentlemen and players scenario has apparently never disappeared! However well the England players are paid, it doesn't compare with their footballing counterparts in England - you should be comparing their salaries with other top sportsmen in England which is, after all, where they all live, and this would be the valid comparison if we were looking at any other profession. Or should an accountant in the UK not strive for more earnings merely because in Australia they earn three times less?!
Posted 05:32 14th April 2008
Val Jones says...
the earning capacity of a player is short lived so they should be allowed to participate. England are the only country that plays all year round being the only North Hemisphere side. I think before we worry about the 20/20 we should see what is going on now with the England side. Lets get them happy before the Ashes. At the moment their body language says something wrong here. We have amongst the top 6 some of the best players in the world but they aren't performing. This says unhappiness in the dressing room. Is it perhaps the new management. Never saw that under Fletcher. Could it be they don't like being seen as a commodity by the powers that be?? Let them play he 20/20, have some fun, no pressure and if they make a few bob good luck to them. Just lets have a happy all firing team by July next year at ANY COST..
Posted 21:20 11th April 2008
Adam Cloonan says...
I think all the centrally contracted players within the English setup should be more responsible with their possible actions. Obviously there would be a huge lure with the sums currently on show but the only reason players such as Flintoff and Pietersen would be offer similar amounts is due to the english county scene and the international stage, if they were to simply forget that and join up although the short term benifits would be great for them, what would happen for them in the long run? No one is garunteed a prolonged golden patch in form especially in the twenty over format and surely the ECB wouldn't regard the desicion from such high quality performers as the likes of Flintoff and Pietersen highly so when their form eventually does dip, regardless of what they are able to bring to the England team, surely the ECB and selectors will not have as much faith in them due to the desicion to turn their back on English cricket for a period of 6 weeks. Then where would it leave these stars in the England fold... back with their counties and a high possibility of loosing their central contracts and the comfort zone that comes with it. As regards to test cricket dwingling away, i feel no country would let that happen as there is no other form of cricket which requires as much skill after all the twenty over format has a high level of luck with the fast pased nature. Furthermore, the IPL has only just been set up, it could yet fail after a year or two if the big names provided don't provide satisfactory entertainment to the predominantly indian fan base after all there are already two other formats like this one within the English county and also within the international stage, people are in my opinion just getting on the band wagon too soon without real justification.
Posted 20:04 11th April 2008
Clive Christie says...
Nasser has a point, however in the wider scheme of things i think we are witnessing the death of Test Cricket as we know it.
Posted 14:13 11th April 2008
Ryno Potgieter says...
I can see Nasser's point, and of course the point of the ECB. I don't know what salary Pietersen and Flintoff is on, but if the ECB really wants to help these guys, at least give them a once off opportunity to go and play in the IPL. But then they must also help the ECB and their county, and they must sacrifice their benefit year with their counties. This will make it possible for someone with a lesser profile than Pietersen and Flintoff, to have a benefit year, which would otherwise not have had a benefit year at all.
Posted 11:46 10th April 2008
Marcus Claytor says...
I think Nasser has a fair point. Even though from a fans perspective it would be interesting to see players like Pietersen play in the IPL, we stil get to watch them play in 20/20, one-dayers, and Test matches - in both domestic and international cricket. The only two advantages I can see for Pietersen playing in the IPL are 1) for the enjoyment of playing even more cricket than he already is and 2) financial, which after seeing him in a number of advertisements over the last couple of years I'm sure he's not doing too badly for himself.
Posted 11:25 10th April 2008
- Page 1 of 1
- 1


















Recent Comments:
Ravi Iyer on A warrior within
"Well, Nasser. It is interesting to see how much importance the Englishmen attach to a coach. If your Ashes hinges on who will be the coach, then you know that you don't have a good ... " View all comments