I read an article in the Daily Mail recently, which posed this question: Why is the popularity of darts going through the roof, while interest on snooker seems to be on the wane?
It's an interesting point. With the success of the world championship at Ally Pally and packed houses at the Premier League every week, darts has never been more popular. Both sports were in Sheffield this week so it seems like a good time to have this debate.
Snooker or darts: which do you prefer?
My personal view is that the success of Phil Taylor is driving darts forward. He is doing things that have been making his fellow professionals gasp in recent times. James Wade (his biggest rival) and Dennis Priestley (now probably his biggest fan) have both commented on how he is raising the bar.
In last year's UK Open he broke the record for the highest televised average with 114.53 against Wes Newton and he continued his record-breaking in the world championship final where he averaged 111 against Barney, by far the best ever in a televised world final.
Just over a week ago, he beat his own record for the highest televised average with 116.01 against John Part in the Premier League. Such a playing level is thrilling players and fans alike. In comparison, a snooker player getting a maximum 147 break seems almost mundane.
In snooker, the appeal has mainly come from the mavericks. In its heyday there were guys like Alex Higgins and Jimmy White; maverick geniuses who were great to watch.
We have a sport where there are mavericks like Adrian Lewis and Peter Manley, but the tone of our sport is set by the amazing achievements of Taylor. He seems to be able to break some sort of record almost every week.
The only natural genius around in snooker these days is Ronnie O'Sullivan, but the tone tends to be set by "boy band" players with their infinite safety play. There are far too many young lads who are lacking charisma and I believe that is one of the reasons why snooker is losing popularity.
You could argue that darts can be performed in front of 6,000 to 9,000 people in fancy dress getting very excited. Obviously the crowd has to be more subdued when watching snooker. I'm not sure it's fair to compare the popularity of the two games because of that.
Generally though, darts has a wider demographic to appeal to. I think our sport - with its mad commentary, walk-on girls and razzmatazz - is more suited to people of both sexes aged between 15 and 45.
I would argue that the way darts is shown on Sky Sports, like a pop concert with plenty of razzle dazzle, is more attractive to that age group than snooker.
I have even read suggestions that snooker commentators should become as freewheeling - and occasionally off the wall - as us darts lot...
So why is darts on the rise while snooker seems to be on the wane? Can snooker learn anything from darts? Sid wants to hear your comments on this one using the feedback form below...
Comments (47)
Christopher Taylor says...
darts is brilliant,,,,,,snooker is too,,,,,,,,,it really was great when alex higgins was about,there was a kind of wild excitement about it in those days,the game itself is perfect and doesn't want tinkering about with or altering in any way,,except of course the dreaded boring miss rule,l mean who wants to watch the ref constantly putting the balls back for half an hour,maybe only have a maximum of 3 misses,or none at all if its obvious the player is trying to hit,,,and the devastating effect it has on a player in a tight game in the final stages of say the world c/ship for a ton o'money,,well they must feel like going home,,,,snooker looks to me as if its been run by a load of 1950's school teachers obsessed with discipline,,,,,don't alter snooker or the way its played but it could be made more exciteing in the build up and the inbetween bits by some marketing and televisual genius,,its just a question of finding that person,,,oh and bring back clive everton the best commentator there's ever been
Posted 20:36 23rd September 2009
Mark Turner says...
Don't be fooled into believing that snooker is dying, it simply isn't. Darts is back in the spotlight in a big way, purely because of SKY and Hearn's advertising genius. You look at the Premier league, and tell me more than 50% of the people there even know whats happening - Its a night out, not a darts match. Snooker dosn't belong in that environment, and I pray it won't ever be there. It still continues to pull the second biggest TV audience behind football. FACT.
Posted 15:55 11th September 2009
Richard Webb says...
Snooker needs change . Needs to be more exciting . The minute per shot should be introduced were a player have a miximun of a minute to play . Could also try changing colors from thier usual spots starting with the black on the yellow spot and so on.... needs some fun to make poeple watch...
Posted 18:26 22nd August 2009
Sol Campbell says...
I Prefer snooker to anything else, that way i can see men bending over all day ennit. good times.
Posted 22:54 2nd August 2009
Martin Dickson says...
its all about the crowd, darts have a party atmosphere and you know your in for a great night regardless of who¿s winning. i think about a quarter of people on a premier league darts night don¿t give a dam about what¿s going on, they are simply along for the ride
Posted 13:28 2nd August 2009
Ben C says...
Darts is simply better as its more entertaining walk on music crazy crowds and the standard of the game is gerrin beta n beta. Snooker however the players just walk in and get a mild round of applause and of they go with not a murmer from the crowd as half of them bagin to fall asleep.
Posted 17:24 31st July 2009
James Ziants says...
As an American, I would like to submit my comment. I think the commentators make or break the sports popularity. Darts on TV is the US is a rare occurence. When it does come on, it is at an obscure time. Snooker does not get any play on American TV. I have to go to Youtube to watch any matches. The commentary is brilliant from Dennis Taylor and Steve Davis. I enjoy watching the Mosconi Cup. The commentary from Sid Waddell and Jim Wyche made the American commentators seem quelled. Sid's enthusiasm is very catchy. I think that is why darts is more popular, you need to have brilliant commentators.
Posted 16:08 24th July 2009
Phil Taylor says...
Arrogant, me? I don't even know the meaning of the word. I love watching a playing snooker, but find the constant bending over the table criples my back so I decided to try darts instead. Bless him, Barnie tries hard and James Wade too, but they just can't cut it in the big time. I'm loving playing darts and winning everything but would welcome a bit more competition - so come on Mervyn, step up to the plate. To be honest with you, the best chance I've got of getting a decent game at the moment is our new mate Gary Anderson. Yes, he's got a few chinks in his game - and he knows what they are to be honest with you, bless him - but once he gets those sorted, he'll be a half decent player. He played well on Friday evening - I played better.
Posted 13:20 6th July 2009
Shark Finn says...
I enjoy watching and playing both sports. I feel it is mainly about characters. When Ronnie inevitably gets knocked out of a tournament, I loose all interest. Darts on the other hand has several top class players, james wade, barney, etc., all capable of scoring 100+ 3-dart averages for the duration of a game. Also no matter how bad a game of darts is, it can be set on fire by one high checkout (120+) or 2 180's in a row (he's on a nine darter). Even with all this to keep me interested, the number 1 reason for me following darts is to see Phil taylor getting knocked out. I can't stand his arrogance and the way he talks down to his opponents after beating them (bless him). To add to this when taylor is beaten and unfortunately it doesn't happen often enough, it somewhat tones down sid wadell's constant praise of his lover (i can't see any other reason why he only sees darts shots in terms of how taylor would do it. ie tayloresque arghhhhh!!!!!!!!!). I watch with the mute button on anymore....
Posted 12:20 17th June 2009
Rab Carr says...
Snooker is losing its popularity because of its lack of characters and the slowness which it take to play a frame. Darts is much more colourful and the sponsorship which it receives has ensured that the money invested has been put to good use and has created more colourful characters. I love both sports but the razzamatazz in darts is that little bit special.
Posted 21:21 4th June 2009
Adrian Rathbone says...
To start with I am a big darts fan and have been for a long time, well before the boom. To be honest i'm fairly bored of the premier league, Wayne Mardle wildcard every year? Why? ok yeah his walk on is entertaining but after that he's rubbish and can't even come close to the top players. Lets have Van Gerwen or Van der Voort next year instead. My biggest problem with darts on sky is Phil Taylor. I just can't stand Sid Waddell endlessly going on about how great he is. It doesn't matter who's playing, thats all he talks about, and that stupid commentry i'm sick of it. Getting rid on Waddell would be the best thing sky could do. I think Taylor is the best ever btw. Snooker will always be better for me, Is sky slagging snooker because they don't broadcast any ranking events, only the premier league.
Posted 17:03 4th June 2009
Liam Lonergan says...
Darts is fast,exciting and cheap,it has its characters,champions and legends like every sport but it has been looked upon as the"poor relation"to other sports, but no longer!roll on the uk open,180!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted 17:01 28th May 2009
Scott Cornwell says...
Recently there has been much debate on whether or not snooker should follow darts' lead to modernise the sport. I have a question of my own¿ Would football benefit from becoming a little more like snooker? First of all, notice the largely impeccable behaviour, sportsmanship and manners of the competitors even under extreme pressure. Then there's the supportive yet generally respectful audiences who can be surprisingly loud yet remain in the control of the referee's, who in turn are incredibly diligent and rarely if at all, make mistakes. I wondered if an obvious mistake would lead to a player chasing the referee around the table? Snooker has in place the ultimate performance related pay structure - yes continued success is rewarded handsomely but one-off tournament glory is just that and although it may help reduce the mortgage or pay for a car, the need to earn a living will remain. Consider those mercenary footballers who have on the back of a period of short-term success, perhaps in a tournament, secured a multi-year, multi-million pound contract and set themselves up for life. People often ponder the lack of characters in snooker but I found similarities between Ronnie O'Sullivan and Jose Mourinho, both play the game the way they want and will, for better or worse, always say what they want. For Sir Alex Ferguson, see Stephen Hendry. They both have a burning desire to constantly add trophies to their already vast collections but they don't always take defeat in the correct manner. Is football crazy or is snooker loopy?
Posted 12:21 27th May 2009
John Musgrove says...
The answer is easy and it is soley down to one factor.........the ability of barry hearn to popularise a sport that had lost its way and had got a bad name. Snooker is being carried at the moment entirely by ronnie o,sullivan and although many people did not like his comments about it needing some major adjustments he was dead right. darts is fast, skillful and there are some great players and the weekly attendances at the premier league speak for themselves. the only thing that remains is to get the prize money for darts up to the level it should be at. whilst i used to be an avid snooker follower (highest break 132) i hardly watched the world championships. i cant stand one hour frames with thorne and virgo attempting to make it interesting. for snooker to make a comeback there has to be a very radical change in the format of frames with much faster and more exciting elements to hold the viewers attention. until then darts will continue to thrive whilst snooker will re-enter the days of fred davis and john pullman.
Posted 18:08 17th May 2009
Mark Treadwell says...
I'm a young lad in my teens and i have enjoyed darts so much, from the age of 10 i have followed it since. Phil Taylor has certainly raised the game into the stratasphere and he deserves every penny he has. I'm sorry though but snooker: Takes ages to play Has about 2 televised tournaments (darts has 7+) The odds are against snooker and when Phil Taylor does unfortunately retire, darts won't fall back. By the way James Wade has been playing, the standard is going to fly up and up and up!
Posted 19:44 16th May 2009
Stuart graham Everett says...
I agree that snooker needs to flower Darts I love both sports played both for a lot of years somebody needs to start talking in snooker make it happen the fans would love it I for one would come on snooker wake up move with the Times jive the fans something to talk about
Posted 19:57 15th May 2009
Mark Smith says...
snoooker is becoming boring take the world championship you have got good young players coming through but they are so boring dont smile if o sullivan was not there then snooker would be a turn off john higgins is a great player to watch and i enjoy is battling qualities but the world championship has got to start giving wild cards out for the likes of players like jimmy white if you ask 1000 people if they would want to see jimmy white at the crucible i would think all of them would prefer him than a young player who says nothing give jimmy a wild card
Posted 18:51 14th May 2009
Sam Smith says...
its definitely football .. lol ... darts and snooker are great , although football is the best sport on the planet
Posted 20:42 12th May 2009
Rob Williams says...
Darts on Sky with all it's razamatz is having an effect at the grass roots level, with our local league in Llandudno now increasing the number of divisions within that league, and with far more youngsters taking part as well Our local snooker hall, last year entered two teams into the league. Says it all I think
Posted 11:17 9th May 2009
Justin Fawcett says...
i think people that say darts is stupid is because they can't play it or can't do it. those people should try it sometime. as for snooker that is fine too. but these two sports are the same as everything else. for example i don't like figure skating because i can't do it. dosen't mean i am going to shoot my mouth off like some euro hooligan.
Posted 19:58 8th May 2009
Recent Comments:
Nick Leech on Blackpool rocks!
"Being from Blackpool and currently living in Blackpool, I wanted to get some tickets for this tournament. Adrian Lewis played really well last night, but it'll be hard to get past ... " View all comments
Andrew Sewell on Snookered by darts?
"Snooker has little appeal to the younger generation simply because it is unexciting. I'd take my 13 year old son to watch a darts Premier League match but he would not relish the ... " View all comments
David Coulthirst on BDO vs PDC
"sadly i have to agree with a great many comments i have been reading here,the bdo has become a feeder system to the pdc,it has not moved with the times and has fallen way behind the pdc... " View all comments