I was fortunate enough to attend the Sports Industry Awards last week, a glittering annual ceremony where the great and the good gather to pat each other on the back.
The FA were there, to pick up an award for the work they'd done in promoting women's football this year. Many would argue their prize was richly-deserved; after all, the women's game appears to be booming, with over a million females having now played football of some kind in England.
Arsenal Ladies: utterly dominant
The number of registered players has dramatically increased from just 11,000 in 1992 to 150,000 by last season, and it's the most popular sport for girls in the country. Meanwhile, a team of Women's Development Officers have been deployed across the County FA's to build the game regionally, building on England's advancement.
The team, marshalled by the inspirational coach Hope Powell, and including fine role models and athletes like Faye White, Rachel Brown, Eniola Aluko and Kelly Smith are now ranked 11th in the world after reaching the quarter-finals of the World Cup last season. Monday's Women's FA Cup final, held at Nottingham Forest's City Ground attracted a crowd of 25,000 people. And champions Arsenal Ladies are the holders of the UEFA Cup.
Despite all the achievements in popularity of the ladies' game, despite it being ingrained in the public consciousness by the film Bend it like Beckham, it remains a poor relation to men's football. The feeling that football remains the preserve of men remains. But the fact is that this isn't the case in other sports like tennis or athletics where women enjoy equal billing, prize-money and status.
Dan Roan
Quotes of the week
Mondays, Sky Sports News
STUDIO DEBATE
Monday nights, Sky Sports News
To see the previous State of the Game reports click HERE
However, this growth in participation and international success tells just one side of the story. Our fifth State of the Game investigation revealed that there remains a number of deep-rooted problems with women's football that hampers and holds back its development.
Firstly, there remains a genuine lack of playing opportunities for women, especially once they become teenagers. There are far fewer female teams around the country compared to the provision for boys and men. We featured one former player, Stephanie Bulfin, who gave up football after she found the nearest club to her in West London was forty minutes drive away. She blamed the FA for prioritising the men's game, and argued there needs to be more teams and leagues to cater for the enthusiasm created by girls' mini-soccer.
Development
Secondly, many believe the rule that outlaws mixed football after the under 11 age group must be amended to a higher age. This regulation forces a large proportion of girls to join weaker single-sex teams, where their development is stunted; many then drop out of the sport as a consequence.
North Ferriby United, a mixed under 11's team in Hull have appealed to their local council to help them get round a rule that will force their three promising female players to leave the side at the end of this season. Dave Batte, their coach, was angry that in other countries such as Germany and Holland, selection is based purely on merit, and he believes no such restriction should exist here either.
The FA admitted to us that the rule needs reviewing, and have begun a trial allowing girls up to the under 14 age group to continue playing alongside boys. Laura Dennison is one of the few fortunate girls taking part in the experiment, and insisted that being allowed to play in a mixed team has helped her development as a player.
And thirdly, there's an issue we've tackled before in our State of the Game series; facilities. A worrying 94 per cent of pitches in England lack basic changing facilities or even toilets for women. It's no surprise so many women drop out of the sport once they become teenagers when there only option is to get changed in the car park! Kathryn Hall, of Northants FA, told us that girls football is still bottom of the pile when it comes to investment, and much more spending is required if the game is to grow.
If more girls are to be encouraged to take up football at the grassroots level, the elite end of the sport clearly must play a role, in the form of inspiration. The problem is that the women's game suffers from a lack of profile, TVcoverage and money that the best male players in the country take for granted. In 2000 the FA's then Chief Executive Adam Crozier promised us a professional elite women's league within three years. Eight years have passed and we're still waiting.
The top players in this country are still amateur, having to make do with travel expenses and the odd match fee of £100 a week if they're lucky. When England's women made the quarter-finals of the World Cup last year they were given just £40 a day by the FA for the five weeks they were away.
There have been casualties that would make many girls question whether a career in football is really for them. Take Fulham for example; after hearing the FA's commitment to a pro league, they set up Europe's first professional ladies team in 2000. Having spent £5million on it, the club disabanded the set-up in 2006. Or Charlton's ladies, who suffered a similar fate when their male counterparts were relegated from the Premier League last season. The club saved £250,000 by closing down the women's academy and team; compare that to the £16.5 million it made from Darren Bent's sale to Spurs.
Disbanded
Lorrie Fair, an American player with Chelsea, believes Premier League clubs, awash with cash, could and should do more to help the women's game. She questioned why Manchester United don't have a ladies side (they disbanded theirs in 2004), and pleaded with more clubs to follow Arsenal's lead, who have invested in their female side more than anyone in recent times.
Their all-conquering women's team were recently lent the Emirates Sstadium to clinch their fifth successive title. It was only the second time they'd got to use the ground though, and even then, the attendance was fixed at just 5,000 to save on stewarding costs.
There are other problems with the elite league; the predictability caused by Arsenal's utter dominance does nothing for attendances being one. The fact that it's played in the winter in direct competition with the men, is another. The FA seem to recognise this, and made a commitment to the "possibility" of a restructured elite summer league by 2012, but given Crozier's previous pledge, don't hold your breath.
As with many things in life, it's easy for the status quo to be accepted, and remain unquestioned, simply because it's the way it is, and always has been. But when it comes to the gross inequality that women's football struggles with, it needn't be this way, and it must be challenged.
Despite all the achievements in popularity of the ladies' game, despite it being ingrained in the public consciousness by the film Bend it like Beckham, it remains a poor relation to men's football. The feeling that football remains the preserve of men remains.
But the fact is that this isn't the case in other sports like tennis or athletics where women enjoy equal billing, prize-money and status. And it isn't the case in countries like China or the USA, where a new pro-league is due to start next year, and where female players are true celebrities, playing in front of packed stadia.
Women's football has come a long way. But it's also got a long way to go.


















Comments (10)
Scott Torbett says...
Personally i think the womens game is very dull. I may not like watching womens teams play however i do think its great that they want to play and enjoy the game cause thats what its about. Being in the armed forces i have had the opertunity to play with and against ladies and its been very enjoyable every time. some have been decnt players some have been terrible (but so were some of the men), most of all the girls enjoyed it as much as the lads. Too much time is spent talking about the bigger picture (womans pro leagues, Premiership teams having and not having womans equivilent, i just dont think its financially viable at the moment) and more time should be spent on grass roots development of the game. Let the girls play with boys upto the age of 16, if there good enough let them play. Womens football needs to stand up for itself though. if there are no leagues in thier area its possible there just isn't the intrest but best thing to do is if your not happy, create a league, get womens fooball running by helping youselves as cant see many men helping. Facilities are just as bad for men too, many time ive got changed next to cattle in a field!!! Main thing is that no one stops playing, boys or girls as its too enjoyable to stop.
Posted 09:39 5th June 2008
Jamie Webb says...
I dont want my money waisted on womens football if they want more opportunity and more money spent on there sport go and get it ,dont whine,,,get on with it but dont whinge to mens football for money!!.
Posted 21:44 3rd June 2008
John Simone says...
I don't think womens football will ever pick up. The mens football is much better and faster. When I have watched womens football, the goalkeepers have been shocking, at best. Arsenals record of nearly 80 consecutive wins shows the lack of talent amongst the rest of the teams. In all sports with a high physical demand, men dominate the sporting world and will always command higher audiences and money involved. I think lorrie Fair's ideas would never stick. If big clubs were to put money into womens football it would just be money down the drain. I have to agree that there should be more money at grass roots level for both sexes, but, where the real football and money comes in, I think it always will, and perhaps should stick with the men. If anybody wanted to know why there is more cash and interest in the mens game only needs to watch game on the box, then ladies football. The answear will be all to clear
Posted 16:33 2nd June 2008
Shaun Craig says...
If people are realistic and honest, they'll admit that the ladies game is slower, less skillful and as a result, dull for spectators who have been fed the fast-paced action of the Premier League. Though as a player myself I'd never want to deny anybody the chance to play the game because there is nothing like it. I'm glad people are showing some sympathy to clubs who have tried to encourage the ladies game, Man Utd, Fulham, Charlton a few mentioned- clubs who have done so at great expense with no reward. When I was a young lad playing in a Saturday morning league, all we had was a school pitch to play our games, with no immediate access to changing rooms, toilets etc. No-one lamented the lack of investment, playing the game was good enough at that age. As mentioned before, no-one likes to subsidise failure...except maybe the government or Lotto commission. Perhaps it would be better for the ladies to create their own FA to handle the running of their game?
Posted 13:24 8th May 2008
Phil B says...
I was fortunate enough to witness the thoroughly enjoyable womens FA cup final between Arsenal and Leeds, the spirit of the game was excllent as were some of the quality of the football (and indeed refereeing) and a big congratulations to all involved. However I have studied sports sciences and psycology and been a overall football fan for many many years and the sad fact remains that football has always been a male dominated sport and unless something is physiologically and psychologically changed at a very young age this will remain true. I remember being a young boy at school playing football at every opportunity, before during and after the educatory day. I remember countless arguements about who the best players were and which teams were going to win the league. I also remember at no time did any girl join in to any of this instead preferring to socialise and play their own games. The point I raise is that whatever sport we play is drilled into us from a very young age and this is not so with the majority of women. So therefore why should or would women display the drive and commitment it takes to continue to play sports once they were no longer required to do so by educatory authorities I for one certainly no longer speak French. At nearly 30 I play for two football teams pay for expensive subscriptions and more often than not wash the team kit much to the dismay of my football hating girlfriend. I commend the FA for the results they have shown so far but the difficulties they will face lie much deeper than just providing facilities, it is changing the overall perception for a large majority of women is that competitive football is mainly for men. The solution is simple but the implementation of that solution is not, to get women to drive women's football, to encourage girls from a young age to play and support WF and therefore put in as much money into WFas men do in theirs.
Posted 13:17 8th May 2008
Rob Moorcroft says...
I personally don't see how womens football in america can be as big as mens football then in England where our national team is considered in the top 10 in the world womens football doesn't even get a mention. It goes as far as i could not even say who was in the top flight or if there is even more than one league. If mens football can be so big why can't women become proffesionals and get paid a huge wage for entertainment. But at the same time mens football is greatly advertised, i do not see many adverts for womens football.
Posted 08:23 8th May 2008
Helen H says...
Am I missing something or are people really that ignorant of the real issues? This isn't about equality, it's about equality of opportunity - big difference. The article merely reiterates what has already been established - the question is, who is responsible and who are they answerable to??? Someone must be - in all other forms of employment and society, it is against the law to discriminate and that's what we are really talking about - employment at the top levels and acceptance in society - why is football allowed to discriminate against females? Why are the FA allowed to get away with it? Any idiot can recognise the differences between the male and female physique, that's not the issue - the issue is why isn't the governing body allowing opportunities for females that they do for males - at all levels of the sport? The idea is not to compete with men or boys, the idea is to have the sport for females on level terms - is it really such a complex issue? As for sports domination being the male domain - this is an interesting perception - perhaps one which comes from a male totally involved in a male sporting environment and hasn't had the benefit of witnessing the passion, interest and excitement amongst the female sportspersons and supporters of this world? Or is the assumption being made that all of us enjoy watching grown men sulk and batter each other on the field when their lack of skill has seen them beaten by someone more skillful - your assumptions are limited to maybe a few - hence the disallusionment of supporters for our national side and the indifference of the fans when it comes to fighting out the title amongst the same four teams each season! Perhaps you compliment the men's game too much!
Posted 00:47 8th May 2008
William Jordan says...
There is perhaps one thing I agree with in that article: allowing promising girls over the age of 11 to continue playing with the boys. Preventing that is sexism, but that's the only place where this argument really rings true. If women's football is to become a viable product, it needs to do so on its own, not with the help of football club subsidies for one. Yes, it could be better funded by the FA, and they could be more innovative in how they spend money, just as they could for the men, but to argue that women's football could one day rival men's football as a product, and thus it should receive much better funding, is faulty.
Posted 20:43 7th May 2008
T P says...
I don't want this to sound negative or sexist, but it probably will, Why should mens football which is profitable and waelthy subsidise womens football which is not, If the womens game can't raise interest and support and get high level sponsorship then maybe its because its not good enough quality to garner that support. To expect big teams to basically provide charity isn't the way to make a healthy league, You need a structure that is self sustaining and run for the benefit of the womans game rather than run to make clubs not look sexist. Why do womens teams need to be associated to mens teams at all, why can't they create clubs with their own history and not live in the shadow of the mens game. Asking for the top teams/league in the mens game to pay for the womens games advancement when there are teams like bournmouth and luton strugling to survive in the lower divsions seems a tad PC. The mens game and womens games are two different propositions and should be considered seperate from one another, The womens game has grown at a significant rate, but it hasn't done anyhting yet to sugest it deserves anywhere near the attention some people demand. Steady growth is required not a massive sudden investment and people claiming we should watch it doesnt mean anything to me, if the end product is good enough then people will watch. And currently its on par with semi-pro quality football.
Posted 16:25 7th May 2008
Karl Dammer says...
The sad truth is womans football will always be a distant second. Its a question of interest and the passion it inspires. Lets be realistic, why are women not allowed to compete wtih men in football, or play in mixed sides? Forgive me for being honest but anyone whos being realistic would tell you its because of the physical superiority of males, a fact supported by looking at the differing times and stats between males and females in any athletic event. What this means is that womans football is seen as an inferior product, a lower level of football lacking the male power and intensity. Is that really going to inspire football fans to follow it? The only way female footballers will ever become successful is if there is an avenue for them to play professionally in male leagues. I dont mean on quota or anything else, I dont want the male game weakened for female equality. I mean on merit. yes 95% will never cut it at the top of the male game, but you would doubtless find a small 5% that could and that alone would bring a huge respect to female football that will otherwise be lacking. All the talk of equal opportunities bores me, if you want equality, make it equal. Males and females given the right to comepete againt each other. Sport and athletics will still be dominated by males but at least it will be on merit and physical ability and the question of equality no longer needs to be drudged up every two minutes. As a sex overall, males are physically superior to females, it astounds me that after all this time in society we are still two cowardly to state a simple truth and be done with it. Nature made it that way and we all know it and should just get on with living with it. Woman have every right a man has, thats how it should be at least, but stop pretending we are equal in all things because we arent. End of story.
Posted 15:55 7th May 2008