Blogs & Opinion

Most strikers would have gone down in Matt Jarvis' position

Kevin Phillips - Kevin Phillips Posted 18th April 2014 view comments

The Matt Jarvis penalty incident at Arsenal this week has sparked plenty of debate.

Should the West Ham winger have gone down when Bacary Sagna caught him? Should the ref have given him a penalty although he stayed on his feet?

It's a grey area and one that needs to be sorted out.

Jarvis: Had every right to go down, says Phillips

Jarvis: Had every right to go down, says Phillips

Personally, I probably would have gone down.

We're trying to stamp out diving and I'm all for that - but if there's contact in the box you have every right to go down. And no one could have had any complaints if Jarvis had done so.

The intent was there from Sagna to try and get something on the player because the ball was well away. I'm pretty sure if that had that happened outside the box the ref would have blown for a foul but because it was in the box and he had to make a huge call he's opted not to take that decision.


Maybe with Jarvis not being a striker that instinct wasn't there.

We're trying to stamp out diving and I'm all for that - but if there's contact in the box you have every right to go down.

Kevin Phillips
Quotes of the week

Generally, as a winger, he's taking the full back on and getting in crosses. He doesn't usually want a free-kick, he wants to beat his man and put the ball in the box. But any striker would have gone down. And you couldn't have any complaints whatsoever.

I commend Jarvis for trying to stay on his feet but it's not something many strikers would do.

Yes, as Gary Neville said after the game, British players do try to be honest like that. No disrespect to the foreign players in this country but if that was a foreign player he would have gone down. But that's the natural instinct of a centre forward. When you're in that penalty box you're looking to gain an advantage.

Referees need to look at themselves as well, though.

If the ref had given West Ham a spot-kick he'd have done himself no harm whatsoever and shown he was brave enough to give the decision.

Referees need to be a lot stronger. Obviously Jarvis is trying to stay on his feet because he feels he has an opportunity but if the ref can see he has no chance of getting the ball then I think he has to award the foul.

If refs don't award free-kicks and penalties when players are fouled but stay on their feet, then what incentive is there to not go down?

back to top

Other Football Experts:

Latest Posts in Football:

Jamie Redknapp

Redknapp - United's Galacticos

Jamie Redknapp says Manchester United may emerge as the new “Galacticos” after their heavy spending....

Guillem Balague

Balague - Falcao wanted Real deal

Guillem Balague says Radamel Falcao spent the summer desperately trying to join Real Madrid....

Alan Smith

Smith - Welbeck exit sad for United

Alan Smith says many Man Utd fans will be upset to see Danny Welbeck move to Arsenal....

Latest News RSS feeds

Falcao dominates deadline day

Hull were the most active club on deadline day but it was Man Utd's signing of Radamel Falcao which grabbed headlines.

Arsenal wrap up Welbeck deal

Arsenal have signed Danny Welbeck from Manchester United for a fee believed to be in the region of £15-16million.

Deadline Day done deals

Keep up to date with all the completed deals with our list of all the movers on Transfer Deadline Day.

United finalise Falcao loan

Manchester United have signed Monaco striker Radamel Falcao on a season-long loan with an option to buy.

Live transfer blog

How deadline day unfolded plus all the reaction to signings of Radamel Falcao, Danny Welbeck, Hatem Ben Arfa and more.


Transfer deadline day: Hit or miss?

Transfer deadline day: Hit or miss?

Every fan hopes their club can produce the best signing of any transfer window. Sometimes a new arrival can indeed prove to be a masterstroke but sometimes that latest signing can also develop into an expensive mistake.