Super League: Leeds Rhinos critical of RFL's Zak Hardaker investigation
Last Updated: 03/09/14 3:47pm
Leeds Rhinos have jumped to the defence of full-back Zak Hardaker, labelling the RFL's investigation into an alleged homophobic comment a ‘witch-hunt’.
It is believed that the investigation relates to comments made towards St Helens second rower Mark Flanagan by Hardaker in last Friday’s 13-12 victory for Saints.
Rhinos chief executive Gary Hetherington is baffled as to why an investigation has been launched given the match referee Richard Silverwood neither reported any incident or comment
We are concerned there appears to be a witch-hunt by the RFL towards Zak Hardaker and we are calling for an external investigation into the issues surrounding the investigation.
Hetherington on Hardaker
The St Helens player in question is believed to have failed to hear the alleged comment and Leeds are eager to understand why the RFL are pursuing the matter with such intent.
“We are concerned there appears to be a witch-hunt by the RFL towards Zak Hardaker and we are calling for an external investigation into the issues surrounding the investigation,” Hetherington told the club’s official website.
“We know the Match Commissioner was asked by the media at the post match press conference if the Referee had reported any incident or comment and they were told 'No'. We want to know why the Referee's report quite mysteriously now contains a reference to a possible comment.
“It seems incongruent with the RFL's stance and the vigour that they are now pursuing this incident with that the referee would not have reported this to his superior on the night, as is the protocol in these circumstances, or taken action during the game.
“We understand a St Helens player has been interviewed and he has stated he did not hear anything. There is a hint of mystery about the whole issue and the use of a lip reader has added a new dimension to on-field conduct, particularly when games are televised.
“We also want to better understand why the RFL are pursuing this so rigorously. The only person who appears to have heard anything at all is the Referee and he has belatedly reported this despite not taking any action on the field or after the game with the match commissioner. We want to know the timeline and those involved in this process.
"Given that no charge has been made, it is remarkable that Zak's name was released to the Press Association by an RFL spokesman on Tuesday and this just adds the doubt behind the whole process.
“The duty of care from the governing body to an individual under investigation is surely paramount. The RFL's guidelines state that the burden of proof lies with the RFL and anyone under investigation is innocent until proven guilty.
“Whilst the RFL deliberate and we will continue to support Zak and at the same time press the RFL for clear transparency about the whole process.”