Last updated: 9th June 2009
Slam success: Federer is congratulated by Andre Agassi following his French Open win
Roger Federer was a broken man four months ago after losing an epic Australian Open final to Rafael Nadal, but any tears following his win in Paris would have been of joy after he cemented his place in tennis history.
The 27-year-old beat Swedish surprise package Robin Soderling 6-1 7-6 6-4 in the French Open final to move level on 14 major victories with Pete Sampras and become only the sixth man to achieve the career Grand Slam.
"It's up to the fans to judge whether it was the best ever," says the modest and unassuming Federer.
He was hailed by Andre Agassi as "the best I've ever played against" after he beat the American in his last professional match in the 2005 US Open final.
He has now joined the elite group of Fred Perry, Don Budge, Rod Laver, Roy Emerson and Agassi as the only men to clinch all four major titles.
Agassi, the only other man to achieve the feat in the Open era, believes his triumph confirms Federer's status.
"It ends the discussion of where he fits in the history of the game," said the 1999 Roland Garros champion.
"It's not so much a question of Pete. If it wasn't for Nadal, he probably would have won a handful of these things, so nobody would underestimate where he deserves to fit in this game.
"This is going to mean so much to him, to have that hole filled. I think it will change his life."
Having lost the three previous finals at Roland Garros to Nadal, Federer must have wondered whether his time would ever come on the Paris clay.
But he has time and again proved himself to be a formidable figure in the face of adversity.
Federer in 2007 equalled Bjorn Borg's record of five consecutive Wimbledon singles titles, defeating Nadal in five sets to also draw level with Borg and Laver on 11 Grand Slams.
His run of five successive Wimbledon titles came was ended last July by Nadal, who compounded the Swiss' misery by relieving him of the world number one spot the following month.
"It was a fair battle, which was tough with the rain delays," the Basle-born player said after Nadal's 6-4 6-4 6-7 6-7 9-7 victory at SW19.
"There were some great points and I think we both stayed tough until the very end.
"In tennis unfortunately there have to be winners and losers, there are no draws. But it was probably my hardest loss by far. It doesn't get much harder than this."
Demoted to second in the ATP rankings after an amazing 237 weeks at the top, Federer responded to his summer disappointments by beating Andy Murray in September's US Open final to move within one triumph of equalling Sampras' mark.
That quest was thwarted by Nadal in Melbourne, however, as the powerful Mallorcan battled out a thrilling 7-5 3-6 7-6 3-6 6-2 win to become Australian Open champion.
Federer was reduced to tears by his Melbourne Park heartache, saying during an emotional post-match speech: "God, this is killing me."
He went on to pay tribute to his rival, who stepped up to the podium to console the beaten finalist in a show of great sportsmanship between the two best players on the planet.
Federer got through the presentation ceremony, but must have been left to ponder whether he had witnessed the changing of the guard with Nadal - five years his junior - now holding three of the four slams.
But he added a steely determination to his grace and elegance on the court to counter that fear and get himself back on the grand-slam trail.
Without an obvious flaw to his game, Federer's greatest strength is perhaps his composure in the face of immense pressure.
It is difficult to imagine a more complete player - or a more worthy addition to the esteemed group of career Grand-Slammers.
Novak Djokovic has a great chance to build his self-confidence in Rotterdam this week, says Barry Cowan.
Barry Cowan says Andy Murray should use his Australian Open final loss as a springboard to greater things.
Comments (12)
Krithika Shekhar says...
Roger is no doubt the best.The ease with which he plays not only grabs attention to the sport but also pulls in respect for him.He is remarkable.As far as ,Rafa i do not think he should be compared cos he is just too young and has a long way to go.It was assumed that he(Rafa) is unbeatable on Clay but now you cant say that.Laver(30 years from now) played at a time when tennis was almost unknown.But with Rogie the game is faddish.So he certainly deserves the top place in the Open era.
Posted 13:16 10th June 2009
Lanre Olujide says...
I think Nadal is a great player,and still has a lot of years ahead of him,But is he going to be fully fit to see those years through?The amount of time and energy he puts to matches and practice would eventually tell on him.If he is going to break Fed express records,then he has to take things a little easy for longevity sake...
Posted 10:00 10th June 2009
Matthew Barr says...
Long Live Federer! Certainly the greatest in the Open era, and probably of all time. Massive shout out to Sampras, who must be gutted. Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal's rivalry is something special for tennis fans to savour, and we can only be amazed at the standards these two continually produce. The mutual respect between the two is also astounding, as if it was not for Federer, Nadal would not be so pushed and driven to be as good as he is. I wonder if Rafa can surpass the great man, and only time will tell, though I look forward to finding out!! Peace.
Posted 22:42 9th June 2009
Hamzah Hakim says...
Rafa Nadal's riegn is over. Just like the Spanish empire the fall is as quick as the rise. His growing injuries are a real concern. And we all forget that the mastermind that is Federer still has his best days to go. He's got alot left in that tank, a few more Wimbeldons a few more US Opens and dare I say hold all four tittles at the same time!
Posted 21:17 9th June 2009
Robbie Birchall says...
He is by far the greatest ever, the stats don't lie. The way he plays the game is unique, only a handful of athletes aspire to greatness at the pinnacle of their sport (Woods golf, Pele football, Armstrong cycling etc, etc..) which explains why only 6 have won all 4 majors. Even the next great tennis player, Nadal, I personally don't think will emulate Fed's success and widespread praise in the game.
Posted 19:54 9th June 2009
Scott Thomas says...
I think fed is great and easily right up there.I still rate sampras number one as i beleive he had more consistent competion throught his career.all a matter of opinion though.
Posted 17:25 9th June 2009
Andy Taylor says...
Hats off to one of the all time greats! In the top 3 easily! Deserves this title and all plaudits must go to him. Question is, was he as good as Rafa at Rafas age, and will we be saying the same about Rafa in 6 years time? I think so, Rafa is still going to be the one to beat but Fed thoroughly deserves the credit he is getting and im glad he can shut all them doubters up.
Posted 11:02 9th June 2009
Joshua Kasali says...
Yes, i do believe Federer is the best, there has been sticulations thet Nadal is better, Nadal can be good but lacks consistency, for 5 years Fed has been in the semis of every grand slam and has gone on to win most of them, even the great Pete Sampras cant compare if u ask me. fed has a long way to go before his through winning GS's but even wen he retires Del potro will clam the throne
Posted 21:42 8th June 2009
Alex Lake says...
Roger Federer will go down as the greatest simply because he has every single shot in the book! ive never seen a player in my life time that will ever beat a fit Roger Federer on his day. Even the imortal pistal Pete would come undone with the Fed express!
Posted 17:13 8th June 2009
Yeshanew Ayalew says...
He still have many slams left in him, and i hope he makes it 20 before he calls it a day. Wim. and us open, number one spot is back.
Posted 14:54 8th June 2009
Dorothy Wilcock says...
At long last the greatest player ever will be recognised as just that and maybe the commentators and pundits who wrote him off prematurely will make that U-turn and start to give him their support. His tennis is quite stunning: no time-wasting or grunting on court and a man who is a fine example to all whether interested in tennis or not.
Posted 12:53 8th June 2009
Vijay Kavasseri says...
With this the discussion for Open era is officially closed. Laver was of a different calibre and time so we cannot compare. Last 30 years absolutely he is the best and has shown that he can win on all surfaces. He can actually relax and play freely and may or may not win more but he has reached the pinnacle. Lets now see how many Rafa can win and if can complet the slam at the US open. Del Potro played great and can also have a great future based on his showing here at the French.
Posted 11:46 8th June 2009