Follow all the build-up to the fight of the year
Win the ultimate British and Irish Lions trip to ...
Find out the thoughts of Borussia Dortmund's boss ahead of the Champions League final at Wembley.
Will the track or tyres dominate? Are Merc really the faves? Can Webber get back on track? And...
Sky Sports caught up with Borussia Dortmund' s Neven Subotic ahead of the Champions League final.
Sky Sports caught up with Theo Walcott to talk England ahead of their forthcoming friendlies.
Sky Sports' reporters reflect on how the 20 Premier League clubs have done this season.
Paul Merson is happy with England's opener, but isn't sure about Ashley Young in the No.10 role.Back to story
I also agree MOSTLY with Merse, however the Ox playing you must be joking he will be another flop like Walcott. However as we do not have anyone else we should ply the latter instead of the Ox. Walcott since 17 has showed promise but when will he fulfill it, he is still at best PROMISING. He still cannot cross and if you put him in the middle is 1 on 1s is crap and he certainly is nowhere near a prolific scorer BUT yes his pace will cause some problem.
Posted 16:00 13th June 2012
Having watched Englands Superb Display Against The French I Turned My Attention To The Sweden , Ukraine game And Noticed That Ibrahimovic Was Given The Task Of Watching Shevchenko From Set Pieces. Shevchenko Left Him For Dead On The Second Goal As He Nippesd In Front Of Him And Headed In At The Near Post. Bring On Andy Carrol And I Think We May Get The Same Result. No Doubt England Will Progress To The Knockout Stages , Then Who Knows. Come On England.
Posted 14:47 13th June 2012
Resting in laurel proved not to be good for England football squad. What Merse is doing, namely giving credit to those that in no way deserve it (including scared Hodgson), will lead to even worse situation and nonperformance. No doubt, England do need some encouragement but one should be careful and not go beyond that.
Posted 10:22 13th June 2012
Great read and I agree on what Paul says, England need to just to do a Chelsea and grind out results to get the job done because lets face it we havent got the talent to play like Spain but we have our strengths in defense and need to use this to the maximum. I thought Ashley Young and Danny Welbeck did a great job up top, they was never going to have much of the ball but when they did they looked dangerous, so they should definitely start the next game together and Rooney shouldn't believe he can walk straght in the team.
Posted 10:05 13th June 2012
I couldn't agree more with Paul Merson. People have to remember that we have to play to our strengths and we don't have the players to play like Barcelona. If we had tried to play football against France we would have most probably lost but playing as we did nearly resulted in a win (if milner had finished his chance).
Posted 09:24 13th June 2012
Paul Collins, I don't know how old you are, 2 by the seems of things... but Rooney has been rushed back from a broken foot twice in major tournaments for England and was clearly not fit when called upon... Don't you think this might be something to do with why he hasn't been prolific for us? A fit Rooney is the second best player at this tournament behind C. Ronaldo... If you can't see this, you are blind, you can't judge him on friendlies because the other 9 lads around him in friendly games, if you havn't noticed, give 10 percent a game and he doesn't recieve the ball and just cuts a frustrated figure... Rooney will add that something to our foward line, and if there is no movement in front of him, can always let loose a 30 yard screamer... with Gerrard now too old to be up and down, who else have we got to produce that... no-one! What Merse said is spot on and exactly what I've said in previous posts.
Posted 08:37 13th June 2012
It occurred to me, if everything was as Paul Merson says, then what went wrong with England's performance. Why the squad played in a way that does not fit with their reputation. Merse is talking about "two banks of four" but, correct me if I am wrong, all of us have seen one bank of nine or even ten deep in England's pitch (half). If Merse's views serve to raise England's squad moral, then I agree. Let's have another blow in a row and another big disappointment, and this is exactly what we are going to get when turning a blind eye on obviously overrated squad by Merse.
Posted 08:14 13th June 2012
The lack of pace at centre back really showed, they were scared of being done for pace so sat on the edge of the area, that just invited pressure. I agree that Terry and Lescott were fantastic but that's cos we sat deep and made France have to chuck balls into the box which they'll put their heads on all day, this means that our midfield has to sit deep as well and that's where the problems lie, we just invite more an more pressure on. I think Welbeck is a fantastic player but how is he meant to score when we have 8 outfield players within 25 yards of our own goal? I hope Roy's done this as we're missing Wilshire, Cleverley, Rooney and Smalling/Cahill/Ferdinand as one or even a pair of those centre backs have the pace to not be frightened by being turned and chasing back and Cleverley, Wilshire and Rooney are all technically sound and have that little bit of extra energy that the years seem to have caught up with for Parker and Gerrard. Also thought Cole had one of his worst games as he was beaten 2 or 3 times at least by his man. If I knew nothing about the players but watched that game I'd have said only Welbeck and Chamberlain looked like decent players and the rest are pretty average for us. The good thing is that we know that we have our best player back against Ukraine and that the players can play better than they did
Posted 23:21 12th June 2012
I agree with most of the comments except regarding johnson, when he is in the defense the only pass he knows is back to the goalie, he very rarely if ever starts an attacking move. I was very disappointed in the way england played, it seems that they do not know how to make two passes in a row without giving it away. Salfordlad
Posted 21:25 12th June 2012
would be interesting to see milner partner parker in central midfield and free gerrard to play that number 10 role. with wingers of walcott and chamberlain. Since milner will offer the energy we need in the defensive role. Which will let gerrard in a more free attacking role.
Posted 19:02 12th June 2012
ia fantastic read, brutally honest but merse is completely rite; we have the best defence but simply dont have the players to win this flair. its def the rite approach, had scholes gone and been playeing the atm role with stevie g we could play attaking with scotty as dm. even with rooney in the side its stiil the way forward, im well happy weve got roy had harry been given the job wed prob had lost the game, been to exposed. just want to say bravo to merse and long may he continue riting his articles are fantastic!
Posted 18:21 12th June 2012
Absolutely spot on Mers
Posted 17:07 12th June 2012
ashley young is a winger not the number 10 role so put gerrard in that role simple!
Posted 17:03 12th June 2012
couldnt have put it better myself mers
Posted 16:55 12th June 2012
Yes your right about Welbeck. He didnt look like scoring because England created 0 oppertunitys apart from the freekick. The only chances he got he made himself by turning the defenders and running into a blue wall, even Messi would of struggled in those situations. Keep with him against Ukraine and Sweden and we will see if Danny looks like scoring...
Posted 16:47 12th June 2012
paul you wann talk about attitude towards england? ok welbeck may not have scored but when has rooney ever been prolific for england? never. its a joke that welbeck can have 2 impressive games like he did yesterday n people like you slag him off and pretty much just say rooney should walk back into the team. thats why england fail. we keep picking failures and regarding them as "messiahs" wake up you idiots. england are still rubbish.
Posted 16:45 12th June 2012
I couldn't agree more Merse and I actually thought we were the better team for the first 30 minutes - comfortable on the ball and looked more dangerous going forward and more likely to open them up. I just wish we hadn't retreated quite so much after going in front as I thought that was the undoing of us and handed too much initiative to the French side. If we can just be a bit braver when we go in front, without being defensively naive, we'll take the pressure off of the defence and midfield a little bit. For all the talk of how many more shots France had than us, the one time that either team carved the other open to make a clear cut chance in open play was the miss by Milner. I was as pessimistic as anyone going into this tournament but I was very happy with England yesterday and my faith in them has already grown. They look disciplined, well organised and seem to know what they're supposed to be doing: a big improvement on the last few tournaments already.
Posted 15:58 12th June 2012
In the main I agree with your assessments which is refreshing as I don't agree with too many pundits who seem to wwatch a different game to us supporters watching at home. Prior to the match I picked more or less the same personnel withthe exception of Jones for Oxlade Chamberlain and I thought a 4-5-1 formation was best to deploy against the French. I thought that their midfield would be too strong and that with just two players in the centre England would struggle and this was shown to be true. With a triangular centre with Gerrad at the tip supporting the lone striker and with Young and Milner wide this would have given England better strength in the centre and a better player to support Welbeck. It would also have given the French defence more problems out wide with Young and Milner bombing down the flanks although Milner was the choice for his defensive capabilities. Even against Sweden or Ukraine, I stll think this is a better formation for England and plays to the strengths of our personnel.
Posted 15:46 12th June 2012
Good column as always Merse, people do need to realise that there are many teams with better forwards than us, but we certainly have the best defense, as chelsea have proved in the champions league, it isn't the amount of possession you have, but how you use it, we should we get out of the group I believe we will have a good chance, we will need to dig deep and grind out some results, which can be done, like we did you the spanish before.
Posted 15:38 12th June 2012
well done the lads would like to see carrol start up front with welbeck swedens defence looked shaky against ukraine and think carrol will cause them problems
Posted 15:23 12th June 2012