Should American face retrospective disciplinary action?
Andre Agassi has admitted he lied to the ATP about his use of the illegal drug methamphetamine.
Agassi tested positive for 'crystal meth' in 1997 but convinced the ATP not to punish him after writing a letter claiming the use was accidental.
That was a lie - as the American has admitted in his new autobiography - and he went on to win five Grand Slam titles after 1997.
The ATP is looking into Agassi's confession and will decide on what action - if any - to take.
Should the ATP take retrospective disciplinary action? And has this revelation tarnished the legacy of a man who won all four of the game's Grand Slams during an honour-laden career?
Share your thoughts below...