Skip to content

Zion Williamson gets favourable ruling in lawsuit by ex-agent

Zion Williamson attacks the baskets in the pelicans' loss to the Thunder
Image: Zion Williamson attacks the basket in the Pelicans' loss to the Thunder

A Florida appeals court has granted Pelicans rookie Zion Williamson's motion to block his former marketing agent's effort to have the ex-Duke star answer questions about whether he received improper benefits before playing for the Blue Devils.

The order on Wednesday shifts the focus to a separate but related case between the same litigants in federal court in North Carolina.

Follow Sky Sports NBA on Twitter
Follow Sky Sports NBA on Twitter

See the NBA's best plays and stay up to date with the latest news

The Florida lawsuit, filed last summer by Prime Sports Marketing and company president Gina Ford, accused Williamson and the agency now representing him of breach of contract and seeks $100m in damages.

That came after Williamson had filed his own lawsuit a week earlier in North Carolina to terminate a five-year contract with Prime Sports after his decision to move to Creative Artists Agency.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Check out Williamson's best plays from the 2019-20 NBA season so far

Ford's attorneys had submitted questions in filings last month that included whether Williamson or anyone on his behalf sought or accepted "money, benefits, favours or things of value" to sign with Duke. They sought answers within 30 days to establish facts under oath in the pretrial discovery process.

Attorneys for the 2019 No 1 overall NBA draft pick had argued the questions were "nothing more than a fishing expedition". Florida circuit judge David C Miller denied Williamson's original stay request, but that was overturned on a temporary basis by the state appeals court, which has now made that ruling permanent, siding with Williamson attorney Jeffrey S Klein that the federal case takes precedence.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Matt Winer catches up with New Orleans Pelicans head coach Alvin Gentry about the Pelicans getting back to work and the status of Williamson

In a filing last week in the North Carolina case, Prime Sports-Ford attorneys continued to argue that Williamson didn't meet the definition of a student-athlete because he was "ineligible" to play college sports. That filing referenced housing for Williamson's family during his time with the Blue Devils as well as three luxury SUVs registered by his mother and stepfather between December 2017 and April 2019 - the latter being the same month Williamson announced he would go pro before ultimately being picked by the New Orleans Pelicans.

Also See:

The argument about Williamson's eligibility is at the centre of the legal fight over Williamson's endorsement potential.

Join our NBA group on Facebook
Join our NBA group on Facebook

Sign up and join the NBA conversation in our Facebook group

Williamson's lawsuit stated that Prime Sports violated the state's sports agent law, both by failing to include disclaimers about the loss of eligibility when signing the contract and the fact neither Prime Sports nor Ford were registered as agent in North Carolina.

Attorneys for Prime Sports and Ford argue the Uniform Athlete Agents Act wouldn't apply if Williamson was ineligible to play college basketball from the start.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Check out rookie sensation Williamson's best alley-oop finishes from his first NBA season

Duke has repeatedly declined to comment on the case because it is not involved in the litigation, but issued a statement in January that school had reviewed Williamson's eligibility previously and found no concerns.

Want to watch even more of the NBA but don't have Sky Sports? Get the Sky Sports Action and Arena pack, click here