Skip to content

Joshua vs Takam: Carl Froch praises performance of Anthony Joshua

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Carl Froch's verdict

Anthony Joshua’s stoppage over Carlos Takam was not premature, argues Carl Froch, who insists that it’s “onwards and upwards” for the world heavyweight champion.

Sensible people that watch boxing would not argue with that decision. The barbarians (I am a barbarian, I like barbaric finishes after watching Mike Tyson over the years) like to see barbaric finishes.

Full report: AJ retains title
Full report: AJ retains title

Joshua broke down Takam in brutal Cardiff battle

It was a solid performance - rounds in the bank, on this stage.
Carl Froch

I think Howard Foster jumped in at the right time [in my first fight against George Groves] and I thought Phil Edwards jumped in at the right time [in Joshua vs Takam].

It's subjective. It's what you like.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Anthony Joshua retained his WBA 'super' and IBF heavyweight titles after stopping Carlos Takam in the 10th round

You cannot argue with the decision. It was a great decision. There was only ever going to be one winner.

Both men really fought well tonight. Takam could have pulled out with those cuts.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Takam says he does not understand why the fight was stopped

Overall, a very good performance. He was looking flat. In the last nine minutes, he's 18st and worked very hard, he had to fight from round two when there was a head clash.

Latest Boxing Stories

I've got nothing but boxes ticked for Joshua. Nothing but praise. It was a solid performance - rounds in the bank, on this stage. It's onwards and upwards for Joshua.