Bumble blogs on the 2012 Olympics, a lost lizard and England's prospects for the Headingley Test.
Bumble blogs on London 2012, a lost lizard and England's hopes...
I've really warmed to the Olympics.
I wasn't really switched on at the beginning and I missed the Opening Ceremony but the whole thing has definitely grown on me.
The biking, in particular, has been excellent while Athers said that the women's weight-lifting was absolutely brilliant!
I've also enjoyed the swimming, canoeing and show-jumping; the venues are world-class and it's obvious that a lot of thought has gone into the whole thing.
However, the 'empty seat situation' rumbles on. I just can't wait to see who has got tickets for the 100m final...
The 'cheaper' seats and the parts of the cycling route where you don't need a ticket to watch - areas that are truly for the people - seem very well populated.
It's a mystery how they can explain away so many empty great seats. However they do it they've got to fill them...
Intelligent
As of Tuesday lunchtime there were a few tickets remaining for the first two days of this week's second Test.
I've made a few trips to Leeds recently and I'm looking forward to going back.
It's a good pitch at Headingley - forget the idea that it's going to seam all over the place; it's a good pitch and it will seam at the end.
By picking James Taylor in place of Ravi Bopara, England have all but bypassed Jonny Bairstow who can consider himself unlucky.
I've only seen Taylor in one-day cricket and while he's played very well in that, this is a Test match.
I wish him well - he speaks very well and looks an intelligent kid - and I just hope that anyone who has been talking him up has seen him perform in four-day cricket.
Please don't judge someone's Test potential on what you see in a Twenty20 of 40-over match.
The selectors clearly like what they see but they've done it before with Stokes, Patel, Morgan, Bopara, Bairstow and now it's Taylor's turn. Number six is becoming a problem position for England.
Mettle
Much of the spotlight has been on England's failure to take 20 wickets at the Oval.
Well, hang on a minute.
The batters should have got 500 on the board first up, especially from 271-3, because the South African response was 637-2!
Rather than point the finger and say 'the bowlers can't do this, can't do that', the batters should have made use of a great pitch and the Test should have ended in a stalemate.
England are certainly capable of coming out of this series very well - and they've got two more Tests to prove it - but they've got to show a lot more mettle with the bat.
Like 'Fred' Boycott says, you've got to dig in at Headingley.
These are two excellent teams. One steam-rollered the other at the Oval, so you'd expect a quality team to bounce back pretty quickly.
The first innings will be crucial for both sides as South Africa look to continue their excellent form. They played brilliantly in the first Test - there's no other way of putting it - but they have a potential problem with the stand-in wicketkeeper AB de Villiers.
If England get into a decent situation and they depend on a crucial catch, I'm not convinced de Villiers will take it. The bottom line is he's a brilliant batsman but he's not a frontline keeper.
Over the course of a series, keeping wicket will take it out of him.
Difficult
I was at Old Trafford last night to cover a CB40 game between Lancashire and Gloucestershire.
The groundstaff hadn't been able to
