Skip to content

Norfolk Stakes: The Ridler keeps Royal Ascot victory as Amo Racing's appeal is dismissed

Amo Racing - owned by football agent Kia Joorabchian - placed an appeal into the Norfolk Stakes result, citing that jockey of the winner, Paul Hanagan, had crossed the threshold for dangerous riding; the panel agreed with the initial decision of careless, not dangerous, riding

The Rider (red cap) drifts across his rivals on the way to winning the Norfolk Stakes at Royal Ascot
Image: The Rider (red cap) drifts across his rivals on the way to winning the Norfolk Stakes at Royal Ascot

The Ridler has retained his controversial victory in the Norfolk Stakes after an independent panel dismissed an appeal lodged by Kia Joorabchian's Amo Racing.

The Richard Fahey-trained colt drifted markedly in the closing stages of the race, hampering the third Crispy Cat and fourth-placed Brave Nation.

Rider Paul Hanagan was handed a 10-day suspension for careless riding after the event but the placings were not altered, a decision then appealed by Amo Racing, owners of Crispy Cat and the runner-up Walbank, who was not impeded.

The Ridler (red) hangs across the track ahead of his rivals in the Norfolk Stakes
Image: The Ridler (red) hangs across the track ahead of his rivals in the Norfolk Stakes

The panel of Bruce Blair QC, Alison Royston and Tim Etherington heard evidence from all concerned parties as the matter was discussed for six hours last Wednesday.

No verdict was reached on the day, but the panel have since decided to reject the appeal, which largely hinged on the suggestion that Hanagan had met the criteria for dangerous riding, rather than careless, which would have necessitated the disqualification of The Ridler.

The written reasons that accompanied the decision said: "Mr Hanagan's riding performance in the race was poor, reprehensible and self-evidently culpable.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Racing expert Kevin Blake says Paul Hanagan's ride on Norfolk Stakes winner The Ridler should not be accepted after the winner survived a stewards' enquiry despite appearing to interfere with rivals.

"His inattention and misjudgement were not defensible. He is a jockey of huge experience (with approaching 17,000 rides and 2,200 winners behind him) and should have done much better.

Also See:

"It was a bad, high-level instance of careless riding and he entirely deserved a suspension of real substance.

"An essential point to emphasise, however, is that at the end of the day we do conclude that what happened did properly fall into the category of careless riding; and not just simply because, under the regulations in this country, it is probable that no other categorisation is in fact possible.

The St Leger Festival live on Sky Sports Racing
The St Leger Festival live on Sky Sports Racing

Watch every race from the St Leger Festival from Doncaster, including the final British Classic of the year, live only on Sky Sports Racing from September 7-10

"In the panel's view the prospect of Crispy Cat having won, absent the interference, was slim in all the circumstances to which we have referred.

"That said, we have in any event in the course of explaining our rationale expressed our view as to the ease with which The Ridler won the race."

Around Sky