Skip to content

Diego Maradona admits VAR could have cost Argentina and England World Cup wins

MEXICO CITY, MEXICO - JUNE 21:  FUSSBALL: WM 1986 in Mexiko Viertelfinale ARG - ENG 2:1, MARADONA/ARG'HAND GOTTES ', HANDTOR, HAND TOR  (Photo by Bongarts/
Image: Diego Maradona admits his 'hand of God' goal would not have stood if Video Assistant Referees had been in place

Diego Maradona admits Video Assistant Referees would have disallowed his "hand of God", but could have also cost England the 1966 World Cup.

The infamous Argentine No 10 helped secure his team's place in the semi final of the 1986 tournament in Mexico at England's expense by using his hand to poke the ball past goalkeeper Peter Shilton in the previous round.

After witnessing the introduction of VARs in the Confederations Cup in Russia this summer, though, Maradona has admitted he would struggle to get away with the same trick again, but also insists England's football history could also look very different had the technology been around earlier.

"It's not just my goal in '86 that wouldn't have counted," Maradona told FIFA's official website. "Let's not forget that England won the World Cup in '66 with a shot that didn't go over the line.

Hurst's controversial strike

Geoff Hurst put England 3-2 ahead in the 11th-minute of extra-time of the 1966 World Cup final with a shot that crashed down off the underside of the crossbar. Azerbaijani linesman Tofiq Bahramov decided the ball had crossed the line and gave the goal.

"Then it happened to them in 2010, when (Frank) Lampard's shot crossed the line against Germany but wasn't given.

"England had the ball and scored the goal they deserved, but Germany grew in confidence after that and it changed the match completely.

"There have been lots of incidents where World Cup history would have been different if technology had been used. It's time to change all that."

Also See:

Hurst shot 'did cross the line'
Hurst shot 'did cross the line'

Geoff Hurst's crucial second goal for England against West Germany in the 1966 World Cup final was correctly awarded, according to MNF

VAR has been trialled for use in 'game-changing situations' only (such as goal scored, penalty decisions, direct red cards), and Maradona believes the new technology can only improve the game.

"People used to say that we'd waste a lot of time, that it would cause a lot of annoyance," he added. "But that's not the case.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Scottish referee Willie Collum explains the use of Video Assistant Referees

"People get annoyed when something that shouldn't be given is given, or when you have a goal wrongly disallowed. Technology brings transparency and quality, and it provides a positive outcome for teams who decide to attack and take risks."