Skip to content

FA panel concludes John Yems is 'not a conscious racist' despite outlining a string of offensive racial remarks

Former Crawley manager John Yems has been banned from football for 18 months for multiple breaches of the Football Association's rule relating to discriminatory comments; Warning: The below copy contains language of a racist and discriminatory nature

FILE PHOTO EDITORIAL USE ONLY No use with unauthorised audio, video, data, fixture lists, club/league logos or "live" services. Online in-match use limited to 120 images, no video emulation. No use in betting, games or single club/league/player publica...
Image: John Yems was dismissed as Crawley manager in May

The FA has revealed a string of offensive racial remarks by John Yems but still concluded the former Crawley manager is "not a conscious racist".

Yems has been banned from football for 18 months for multiple breaches of the Football Association's rule relating to discriminatory comments.

The 63-year-old was charged by the Football Association after he made 16 alleged comments which "included a reference to ethnic origin and/or colour and/or race and/or nationality and/or religion or belief and/or gender" to Crawley players between 2019 and 2022.

Yems admitted to one charge and was found guilty of 11 others relating to comments that referenced either ethnic origin, colour, race, nationality, religion, belief or gender between 2019 and 2022.

An independent regulatory commission found four others to be unproven as Yems was earlier this month banned from all football-related activity up to and including June 1, 2024.

But the FA panel did, however conclude that Yems:

A sanctions document indicates the FA pushed for a two-year suspension but the independent panel agreed with Yems' solicitors that their client was not a racist and neither did he "ever intend to make racist remarks".

The FA panel said in its findings: "We regard this as an extremely serious case. We have accepted that Mr Yems is not a conscious racist.

"If he were, an extremely lengthy, even permanent, suspension would be appropriate.

"Nevertheless, Mr Yems' 'banter' undoubtedly came across to the victims and others as offensive, racist and Islamophobic. Mr Yems simply paid no regard to the distress which his misplaced jocularity was causing."

Yems, who took charge of Crawley in December 2019, was suspended for 12 days prior to his dismissal in May.

A number of players from the League Two club took grievances to the Professional Footballers' Association, which sparked the investigations.

Burnett: FA conclusion 'completely and utterly bizarre'

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Kick It Out CEO Tony Burnett says the reports from the John Yems investigation are shocking and an 18-month suspension is not an appropriate sanction

Kick It Out CEO Tony Burnett speaking to Sky Sports News:

"I don't know John Yems, but unless the FA are channelling some sort of superpower that I'm not aware of, they have no jurisdiction and they're actually not qualified to assess whether any individual is a racist or not. So how you can reach a conclusion like that in a case like this is completely beyond me.

"What this says to me in the way this report is structured, is that football has a problem with behaviours. Football has a problem in establishing what is appropriate and inappropriate behaviour, really defining it and really embedding it in the game.

"What the PFA have done in supporting these players and for the players to come forward is a landmark and it's a turning point for football.

"But we have to take this turning point really seriously and use it as a baseline to drive appropriate behaviours across the game of football.

"If you look at the seriousness of some of these comments, I've never heard this level of serious, so-called banter. They're just offensive and disgusting remarks made in a workplace environment.

"I've been involved in this industry for 25 years. In any other walk of life, this would be instant dismissal, but in football for some reason, we have a different standard for this set of behaviours and we're trying to interpret whether an individual is racist. I find that completely and utterly bizarre.

"I think the facts are the facts, and the facts we've established are that a number of really offensive comments were made to Crawley employees by a senior person in an organisation, and we cannot determine whether that individual is not racist. I'm not making that assertion at all, but I certainly know the FA panel haven't got the power or the insight to determine that either.

"What we can say is the behaviour is appalling and it needs to be dealt with. I'm not sure a 15-month suspension is an appropriate sanction for what I'm reading here."

Kick It Out to seek answers from FA

Kick It Out released its own statement on Wednesday morning, in which it said it was "very hard to understand" how the panel had concluded that Yems was not a conscious racist, adding it would be in touch with the FA over the issue.

"The discriminatory language outlined in the FA independent report is simply shocking," read Kick It Out's statement.

"Given the seriousness of the incidents detailed, it is very hard to understand how the FA independent panel have concluded that 'Mr Yems is not a conscious racist'. We do not share that viewpoint.

"The behaviour outlined in the report must be called out for exactly what it is: racism and Islamophobia.

"To speak plainly, a 15-month ban given the severity of the 11 proven charges is a slap in the face to the victims of the discriminatory abuse detailed in this report and anyone who has been subject to racism or Islamophobia.

"Furthermore, to reduce his prolonged string of offensive, Islamophobic and racist remarks to simply being 'misplaced jocularity' shows a total lack of understanding about the damage that this language can cause or the power dynamics that exist in the game.

"This decision also sets a dangerous precedent by allowing perpetrators to hide behind a 'banter' defence when intentionally using harmful and discriminatory language, and we will be in touch with the FA to understand how the panel came to this conclusion.

"We applaud the courage of the victims of this case for coming forward and would encourage anyone involved in the game who sadly find themselves in similar situations to get in touch with us at Kick It Out."

Bamba: FA must do more

Cardiff City defender Sol Bamba
Image: Sol Bamba said the punishment handed to Yems by the FA panel is 'not good enough'

Sol Bamba, the former Cardiff, Leeds and Leicester centre-back, told Sky Sports News that he was "bothered" by the panel's findings that Yems was not a "conscious racist" and that his comments could be described as "banter".

"I understand where Kick It Out is coming from because, with the FA being the guardians, you want them to have a strong response when stuff like that happens," said Bamba.

"You have to think about the victims because, when you play at that sort of level, you're worried about coming out, reporting those claims and whether that's going to affect your career. In my opinion, the FA have to do more.

"It bothered me a bit because I saw the comments he made and they were very, very bad. They were racist, in my opinion - there's no two ways about it.

"So for the FA to say there's no conscious racism doesn't sit right with me. The punishment is not good enough.

"The 'banter' word bothered me right away because everyone should know those kind of racist comments are not banter. They affect people and shouldn't be used anymore. It's as simple as that."

Around Sky